Tools & Wizards About Us
runningtours.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

runningtours.com

Tour Operators United for Runners | Global Tour Operators

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

465 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

539 ms

runningtours.com screenshot

About Website

Visit runningtours.com now to see the best up-to-date Running Tour S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about runningtours.com

T.O.U.R.S (Tour Operators United for Runners) is an association of 40 selected global tour operators who specialise in sports travel, specifically running

Visit runningtours.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Runningtours.com page load time and found that the first response time was 465 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runningtours.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

runningtours.com

465 ms

www.runningtours.com

897 ms

bootstrap.css

849 ms

shortcodes.css

878 ms

style.css

868 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Runningtours.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Runningtours.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Runningtours.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 108.8 kB

  • Original 131.6 kB
  • After minification 129.4 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Running Tour S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 346.7 kB
  • After minification 346.7 kB
  • After compression 341.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 98.0 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runningtours.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (77%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running Tour S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

runningtours.com

runningtours.com

465 ms

www.runningtours.com

www.runningtours.com

897 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

849 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

878 ms

style.css

style.css

868 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

49 ms

front_end_style.css

front_end_style.css

856 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

857 ms

desktop_style.css

desktop_style.css

903 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

1736 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

1720 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

59 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

63 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1715 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1740 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

919 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

937 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

953 ms

init.js

init.js

965 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

984 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1000 ms

pace.min.js

pace.min.js

1019 ms

js

js

101 ms

css

css

54 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1029 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

1043 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

1058 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

1072 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

1084 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1097 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

1115 ms

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

jquery.dotdotdot.min.js

1126 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1139 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1152 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1166 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1179 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1193 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1204 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1216 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1234 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1503 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

1475 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

688 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

710 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

723 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

722 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

744 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

116 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

924 ms

image_resize.php

image_resize.php

890 ms

image_resize.php

image_resize.php

860 ms

image_resize.php

image_resize.php

891 ms

image_resize.php

image_resize.php

890 ms

image_resize.php

image_resize.php

835 ms

font

font

110 ms

js

js

159 ms

collect

collect

156 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

120 ms

home-block-2-3-bg.png

home-block-2-3-bg.png

2871 ms

map.png

map.png

646 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

184 ms

Accessibility Review

runningtours.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

runningtours.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

runningtours.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runningtours.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Runningtours.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

runningtours.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Running Tour S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: