Tools & Wizards About Us
runscanner.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

runscanner.net

RunScanner freeware startup, hijack and malware analyzer

Page Load Speed

711 ms in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

412 ms

Page Rendered

210 ms

runscanner.net screenshot

About Website

Visit runscanner.net now to see the best up-to-date Run Scanner content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about runscanner.net

Runscanner is freeware startup analyzer containing a file list of dll exe and sys process files

Visit runscanner.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Runscanner.net page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 622 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

runscanner.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

runscanner.net

89 ms

runscanner.css

21 ms

counter.js

8 ms

newsmall.gif

11 ms

sprite.png

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Runscanner.net, 18% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Download.runscanner.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) relates to the external source Download.runscanner.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

244.7 kB

After Optimization

202.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Runscanner.net main page is 244.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 201.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.4 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 201.8 kB
  • After minification 180.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Run Scanner needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Runscanner.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Run Scanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

runscanner.net

runscanner.net

89 ms

runscanner.css

runscanner.css

21 ms

counter.js

counter.js

8 ms

newsmall.gif

newsmall.gif

11 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

185 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

101 ms

t.php

t.php

151 ms

space.gif

space.gif

26 ms

runlog.gif

runlog.gif

120 ms

beginner.jpg

beginner.jpg

88 ms

expert.jpg

expert.jpg

88 ms

startscan.jpg

startscan.jpg

87 ms

bugsmall.jpg

bugsmall.jpg

119 ms

scanico.jpg

scanico.jpg

87 ms

forcekill.jpg

forcekill.jpg

125 ms

textfile.jpg

textfile.jpg

120 ms

filter.jpg

filter.jpg

120 ms

clock.gif

clock.gif

122 ms

explorer.jpg

explorer.jpg

121 ms

certificate.gif

certificate.gif

118 ms

bomb.gif

bomb.gif

120 ms

fileadvisor.gif

fileadvisor.gif

120 ms

faq.gif

faq.gif

121 ms

vitustotal.gif

vitustotal.gif

122 ms

module.gif

module.gif

122 ms

google.gif

google.gif

123 ms

rs.jpg

rs.jpg

123 ms

registry.gif

registry.gif

122 ms

smalltuu.png

smalltuu.png

123 ms

lansweeper.jpg

lansweeper.jpg

148 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

21 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

38 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

120 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

39 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

70 ms

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

65 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

14 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

18 ms

SEO Factors

runscanner.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Runscanner.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Runscanner.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

runscanner.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Run Scanner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: