14.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
13.4 sec
193 ms
Visit rwsp.net now to see the best up-to-date Rwsp content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rwsp.net
RWSP has sold more properties than any other agency in the region. We are uniquely positioned to offer boutique, personalised client service – with the added advantage of being backed by the most powe...
Visit rwsp.netWe analyzed Rwsp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 13.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rwsp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value2,020 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
1207 ms
460 ms
685 ms
699 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Rwsp.net, 11% (10 requests) were made to Cdn1.rwaws.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Rw-media.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdn1.rwaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (58%)
2.2 MB
945.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Rwsp.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 157.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rwsp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 718.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 718.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 393.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rwsp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 393.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (78%)
82
18
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rwsp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rwsp.net
1207 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
460 ms
style.css
685 ms
style.css
699 ms
althomepage.css
465 ms
surfersparadise.css
462 ms
theme.css
467 ms
style-media.css
692 ms
jquery-ui.css
695 ms
rwo-jquery-ui.css
694 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
707 ms
colorbox.css
912 ms
local.css
1140 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
1153 ms
rw.namespaces.js
923 ms
rw.widget.js
924 ms
rw.streetadvisor.js
926 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1149 ms
transition.js
1152 ms
modernizr-1.7.min.js
1153 ms
addthis_widget.js
16 ms
utils.min.js.gzip
961 ms
uif.common.js
1154 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1.js
1367 ms
jquery.cycle.lite.js
1367 ms
rwo.hero.js
1378 ms
hoverIntent.min.js.gzip
983 ms
13 ms
rwo.lazy.load.js
1377 ms
bind.js
1381 ms
widget.min.js.gzip
979 ms
core.min.js.gzip
985 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
1379 ms
rwo.property.js
1590 ms
broadsword_child5.js
1590 ms
jquery.ba-hashchange.min.js
1603 ms
rwo.property.load.js
1603 ms
wp-embed.min.js.gzip
982 ms
position.min.js.gzip
982 ms
menu.min.js.gzip
1189 ms
autocomplete.min.js.gzip
1209 ms
rwo.contact.js
1605 ms
jquery.form.min.js.gzip
1437 ms
jquery.validate-1.11.1.min.js
1603 ms
style.css
1137 ms
font-awesome.css
1133 ms
S1438-1424930154-27220-1.jpg.ashx
5514 ms
rwlogo-grey-475.png
443 ms
banner.jpg
1196 ms
Residential.png
442 ms
Marine.png
442 ms
Commercial.png
442 ms
Hotels.png
440 ms
Property-Management.png
703 ms
Projects.png
704 ms
S130651-00074_01.jpg.ashx
3134 ms
S1127-1458267101-28120-4603SoulWeb06.jpg.ashx
8208 ms
S0946-1458265500-6880-1.jpg.ashx
9569 ms
S0940-1458264984-19844-1.jpg.ashx
5165 ms
S0848-1458261875-6628-DSC_0180.jpg.ashx
485 ms
S1255-1458172377-3808-ERB30SentinelApartmentsSurfersParadise-1.jpg.ashx
5084 ms
S1232-1458188568-27711-01MAINSHOT.jpg.ashx
5698 ms
S145396-06046_01.jpg.ashx
6090 ms
S1329-1458187059-20434-Christa9.jpg.ashx
8563 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
rwOHero.png
665 ms
icn-bed.png
664 ms
icn-bath.png
663 ms
icn-car.png
894 ms
2212CA_0_0.woff
1292 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1244 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1219 ms
conversion_async.js
286 ms
analytics.js
265 ms
300lo.json
65 ms
openclose-dark.png
500 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
34 ms
linkid.js
11 ms
ec.js
11 ms
209 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
228 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
234 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
13 ms
51 ms
38 ms
rwsp.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rwsp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rwsp.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rwsp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rwsp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rwsp.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rwsp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: