Tools & Wizards About Us
email01.secureserver.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

email01.secureserver.net

Sign In

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

53 ms

email01.secureserver.net screenshot

About Website

Visit email01.secureserver.net now to see the best up-to-date Email 01 Secureserver content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about email01.secureserver.net

Visit email01.secureserver.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Email01.secureserver.net page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

email01.secureserver.net performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sso.secureserver.net

130 ms

elastic-apm-rum.umd.min.js

380 ms

p.js

33 ms

uxcore2.min.css

331 ms

utility-header.css

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Email01.secureserver.net, 9% (2 requests) were made to Sso.secureserver.net and 5% (1 request) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (380 ms) relates to the external source Unpkg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 538.9 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

596.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Email01.secureserver.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 815.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 162.3 kB

  • Original 206.7 kB
  • After minification 206.6 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 303.0 kB

  • Original 815.1 kB
  • After minification 815.1 kB
  • After compression 512.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.0 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 73.6 kB

  • Original 113.9 kB
  • After minification 112.5 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Email01.secureserver.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (81%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email 01 Secureserver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sso.secureserver.net

sso.secureserver.net

130 ms

elastic-apm-rum.umd.min.js

elastic-apm-rum.umd.min.js

380 ms

p.js

p.js

33 ms

uxcore2.min.css

uxcore2.min.css

331 ms

utility-header.css

utility-header.css

342 ms

95c2f81e5812e203.css

95c2f81e5812e203.css

330 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

365 ms

webpack-5cc060726c006df4.js

webpack-5cc060726c006df4.js

368 ms

framework-cf02f566e862df36.js

framework-cf02f566e862df36.js

363 ms

main-94408688863f3085.js

main-94408688863f3085.js

364 ms

_app-ec3561e708e7ee61.js

_app-ec3561e708e7ee61.js

367 ms

5703-359a988454297d60.js

5703-359a988454297d60.js

363 ms

1845-7ade75786a4c6d01.js

1845-7ade75786a4c6d01.js

367 ms

index-5a9c8454fe81cc9e.js

index-5a9c8454fe81cc9e.js

368 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

368 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

373 ms

hivemind-3.1.0.js

hivemind-3.1.0.js

369 ms

heartbeat.js

heartbeat.js

372 ms

uxcore2.min.js

uxcore2.min.js

373 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

375 ms

scc-gpl-c1.min.js

scc-gpl-c1.min.js

373 ms

utility-header.js

utility-header.js

377 ms

Accessibility Review

email01.secureserver.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

email01.secureserver.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

email01.secureserver.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Email01.secureserver.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Email01.secureserver.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

email01.secureserver.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Email 01 Secureserver. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: