Tools & Wizards About Us
integration.softwareag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

integration.softwareag.com

Application Integration Platform | Software AG

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

261 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

4.1 sec

integration.softwareag.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to integration.softwareag.com homepage info - get ready to check Integration Software AG best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about integration.softwareag.com

Application integration platforms assure the free flow of data across apps, clouds and systems. Get the application integration tools you need in one platform.

Visit integration.softwareag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Integration.softwareag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

integration.softwareag.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,650 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value40.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

integration.softwareag.com

261 ms

436 ms

default.html

183 ms

application-integration.html

231 ms

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASHbd4665babaa1ef1d030bd2d88009d05a.css

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Integration.softwareag.com, 87% (34 requests) were made to Softwareag.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Softwareag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 853.6 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Integration.softwareag.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 927.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 254.7 kB

  • Original 281.0 kB
  • After minification 152.2 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 128.8 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.7 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 927.4 kB
  • After minification 918.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Integration Software AG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 590.2 kB

  • Original 734.8 kB
  • After minification 734.8 kB
  • After compression 144.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 590.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integration Software AG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

integration.softwareag.com

integration.softwareag.com

261 ms

436 ms

default.html

default.html

183 ms

application-integration.html

application-integration.html

231 ms

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASHbd4665babaa1ef1d030bd2d88009d05a.css

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASHbd4665babaa1ef1d030bd2d88009d05a.css

312 ms

dynamicmedia.min.ACSHASH3c8469a4e49f3ab6302e4c2dc9e30f89.css

dynamicmedia.min.ACSHASH3c8469a4e49f3ab6302e4c2dc9e30f89.css

283 ms

launch-29da95ff591c.min.js

launch-29da95ff591c.min.js

39 ms

sharing.min.ACSHASHdeaa6e4b8b10659c43ff882ae8a4b680.js

sharing.min.ACSHASHdeaa6e4b8b10659c43ff882ae8a4b680.js

296 ms

clientlib-searchresults.min.ACSHASHb703c4ed150a404b2c11239d66b993c2.js

clientlib-searchresults.min.ACSHASHb703c4ed150a404b2c11239d66b993c2.js

762 ms

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASH59e1744da4da68945f820eb21c240e23.js

clientlib-site.min.ACSHASH59e1744da4da68945f820eb21c240e23.js

759 ms

viewer.min.ACSHASH4618b42d2de5cb16b5ebca7fdf77812d.js

viewer.min.ACSHASH4618b42d2de5cb16b5ebca7fdf77812d.js

363 ms

dynamicmedia.min.ACSHASH1c0d64a1181f9fc4d177d404992b6b05.js

dynamicmedia.min.ACSHASH1c0d64a1181f9fc4d177d404992b6b05.js

361 ms

i18n.min.ACSHASH68da31d5bd4fb4fe82646d5b80611425.js

i18n.min.ACSHASH68da31d5bd4fb4fe82646d5b80611425.js

384 ms

sag-primary-logo-dark.svg

sag-primary-logo-dark.svg

115 ms

platform-iot-analytics-iot-service-provider.jpg

platform-iot-analytics-iot-service-provider.jpg

405 ms

platform-aim.jpg

platform-aim.jpg

406 ms

platform-bus-process.jpg

platform-bus-process.jpg

405 ms

platform-it.jpg

platform-it.jpg

407 ms

platform-a-and-n.jpg

platform-a-and-n.jpg

1111 ms

customers2.jpg

customers2.jpg

1105 ms

resources-resource-library.jpg

resources-resource-library.jpg

1105 ms

resources-events.jpg

resources-events.jpg

1111 ms

resources-services.jpg

resources-services.jpg

1113 ms

resources-partners.jpg

resources-partners.jpg

1109 ms

resources-communities.jpg

resources-communities.jpg

1119 ms

about-sag-story.jpg

about-sag-story.jpg

1113 ms

sag-primary-logo-light.svg

sag-primary-logo-light.svg

1114 ms

blog-it-investment-strategy.jpg

blog-it-investment-strategy.jpg

1117 ms

icon-linkedin.svg

icon-linkedin.svg

1122 ms

icon-facebook.svg

icon-facebook.svg

1125 ms

icon-twitter.svg

icon-twitter.svg

1127 ms

icon-youtube.svg

icon-youtube.svg

1129 ms

icon-tech-comm.svg

icon-tech-comm.svg

1136 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

300 ms

Roboto-Regular.ttf

Roboto-Regular.ttf

207 ms

Roboto-Bold.ttf

Roboto-Bold.ttf

203 ms

Roboto-Light.ttf

Roboto-Light.ttf

398 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

42 ms

332 ms

Accessibility Review

integration.softwareag.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

integration.softwareag.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

integration.softwareag.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integration.softwareag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Integration.softwareag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

integration.softwareag.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Integration Software AG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: