4.7 sec in total
346 ms
4.3 sec
122 ms
Click here to check amazing Intercamp Scouting content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about intercamp.scouting.nl
RECENT NEWSINTERCAMP BLOG26th May 2017Final informationIn only one week from now, we will all be standing at the opening ceremony of Intercamp 2017! To make sure, that everyone – both troop leaders a...
Visit intercamp.scouting.nlWe analyzed Intercamp.scouting.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
intercamp.scouting.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value25.6 s
0/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
346 ms
1403 ms
273 ms
354 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Intercamp.scouting.nl, 37% (24 requests) were made to Intercamp.info and 25% (16 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Intercamp.info.
Page size can be reduced by 930.4 kB (40%)
2.3 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Intercamp.scouting.nl main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intercamp Scouting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 468.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 387.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intercamp.scouting.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 387.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (45%)
55
30
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intercamp Scouting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intercamp.scouting.nl
346 ms
www.intercamp.info
1403 ms
632c0.css
273 ms
www.intercamp.info
354 ms
css
31 ms
bae57.js
317 ms
2b91e.js
275 ms
95850.js
308 ms
e6c3d.js
483 ms
js
40 ms
13d7d.js
309 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
158 ms
intercamp-logo.png
151 ms
intercamp-logo-small.png
151 ms
home-08.jpg
469 ms
www.intercamp.info
946 ms
home-09.jpg
470 ms
home-11.jpg
484 ms
home-07.jpg
484 ms
home-04.jpg
483 ms
home-03.jpg
657 ms
home-01.jpg
743 ms
20150522_hummle_4495-700x436.jpg
594 ms
Chronic-700x436.jpg
567 ms
sold-out-700x436.png
585 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
127 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
158 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
388 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
658 ms
sdk.js
92 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
330 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
330 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
329 ms
295 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
271 ms
analytics.js
184 ms
page.php
291 ms
collect
11 ms
NGU_mTNA751.css
32 ms
uvIHf6TOjYb.css
30 ms
f9mGsFoKGRJ.js
42 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
39 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
40 ms
iFBP3Ltwel2.js
39 ms
2e4nmgzajeT.js
40 ms
HNrSbojuFT-.js
88 ms
unPWtyjsXeq.js
87 ms
5TmWTVlnCXB.js
99 ms
I0twv5cR4Lp.js
99 ms
S9jMCKT8oc5.js
87 ms
2K9IGvd3K8-.js
98 ms
12250140_10153676320558936_3316518179821712875_n.png
154 ms
97 ms
D3za9fCygGK.js
86 ms
15037295_10154652642498936_7694606562539461826_n.jpg
121 ms
13179015_10209232394031885_2811769420630460110_n.jpg
153 ms
10356775_1512029179016934_5236256667229314214_n.jpg
137 ms
21231196_156807091564683_7620098564279672046_n.jpg
138 ms
19366314_1441825399207232_4740061694526515891_n.jpg
95 ms
20953472_10156360037776729_5052615633113023057_n.jpg
145 ms
14910301_1202849006438503_8857177641656815617_n.jpg
97 ms
20620885_1286854704770226_3731510297826918100_n.jpg
141 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
11 ms
ubBsyVhMcc7.png
84 ms
fontello.woff
142 ms
intercamp.scouting.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intercamp.scouting.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intercamp.scouting.nl SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intercamp.scouting.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intercamp.scouting.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intercamp.scouting.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Intercamp Scouting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: