13.2 sec in total
4.6 sec
8.5 sec
192 ms
Click here to check amazing Jtr St Andrews content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk
Contemporary Voices: The St Andrews Journal of International Relations
Visit jtr.st-andrews.ac.ukWe analyzed Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value26.3 s
0/100
10%
Value15,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value32.0 s
0/100
10%
4584 ms
170 ms
157 ms
257 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk, 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (67%)
1.9 MB
608.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jtr St Andrews needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 789.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 789.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 367.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 367.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (79%)
43
9
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jtr St Andrews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk
4584 ms
jquery-ui.css
170 ms
font-awesome.min.css
157 ms
journal.css
257 ms
overrides.css
159 ms
jquery.min.js
250 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
168 ms
jquery.easing.js
309 ms
jquery.inlineFootnotes.js
307 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
318 ms
raphael.js
423 ms
requestAnimation.js
429 ms
social-likes.js
429 ms
underscore-min.js
460 ms
waypoints.js
470 ms
zepto.min.js
495 ms
jquery.te.js
560 ms
featherlight.js
566 ms
footnotes.js
615 ms
responsive.js
623 ms
scroll-events.js
636 ms
sharing.js
710 ms
slider.js
722 ms
tabs.js
727 ms
tooltips.js
769 ms
article-click-events.js
778 ms
jquery-ui.js
953 ms
application.js
863 ms
up.js
874 ms
cite.js
880 ms
addthis_widget.js
13 ms
header.png
1089 ms
1470 ms
1516 ms
3817 ms
1515 ms
3816 ms
1370 ms
3681 ms
1680 ms
css
66 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
orcid.png
1340 ms
bg.jpg
1751 ms
piwik.js
290 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
29 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
35 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff
50 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
63 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
64 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nmFp2sMiApZm5Dx7NpSTOZk.woff
65 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nnl4twXkwp3_u9ZoePkT564.woff
63 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIL0qgHI2SEqiJszC-CVc3gY.woff
63 ms
So5lHxHT37p2SS4-t60SlHpumDtkw9GHrrDfd7ZnWpU.woff
62 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwIG0Xvi9kvVpeKmlONF1xhUs.woff
64 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1596 ms
collect
16 ms
count.js
119 ms
widgets.js
163 ms
108 ms
fa4299f0-3d98-44cb-92f3-b64a7f843f99.jpg
699 ms
300lo.json
35 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
28 ms
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jtr.st-andrews.ac.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jtr St Andrews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: