Tools & Wizards About Us
pluma.sjfc.edu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

pluma.sjfc.edu

Remote Login to Lavery Library Databases

Page Load Speed

860 ms in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

650 ms

Page Rendered

121 ms

pluma.sjfc.edu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pluma.sjfc.edu homepage info - get ready to check Pluma Sjfc best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pluma.sjfc.edu

Visit pluma.sjfc.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Pluma.sjfc.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pluma.sjfc.edu performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pluma.sjfc.edu

89 ms

login

46 ms

login

285 ms

ezproxy.css

68 ms

jquery.min.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Pluma.sjfc.edu, 22% (2 requests) were made to Login.pluma.sjfc.edu and 22% (2 requests) were made to Sjfc.edu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) relates to the external source Login.pluma.sjfc.edu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 kB (4%)

Content Size

55.3 kB

After Optimization

53.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Pluma.sjfc.edu main page is 55.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 50.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 250 B

  • Original 928 B
  • After minification 678 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pluma Sjfc needs image optimization as it can save up to 250 B or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 50.7 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 597 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 824 B
  • After compression 424 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pluma.sjfc.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 597 B or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pluma Sjfc. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

pluma.sjfc.edu

pluma.sjfc.edu

89 ms

login

login

46 ms

login

login

285 ms

ezproxy.css

ezproxy.css

68 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

253 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

d7692022-c96f-422e-b23d-d53ddf75f33d.png

d7692022-c96f-422e-b23d-d53ddf75f33d.png

193 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

Accessibility Review

pluma.sjfc.edu accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

pluma.sjfc.edu best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

pluma.sjfc.edu SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pluma.sjfc.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pluma.sjfc.edu main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

pluma.sjfc.edu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pluma Sjfc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: