2.2 sec in total
265 ms
1.8 sec
157 ms
Welcome to reviews.scalejunkie.com homepage info - get ready to check Reviews Scalejunkie best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviews.scalejunkie.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit reviews.scalejunkie.comWe analyzed Reviews.scalejunkie.com page load time and found that the first response time was 265 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
reviews.scalejunkie.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
3/100
10%
Value19,210 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.197
62/100
15%
Value31.1 s
0/100
10%
265 ms
191 ms
60 ms
39 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Reviews.scalejunkie.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 813.5 kB (64%)
1.3 MB
463.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviews.scalejunkie.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 901.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reviews Scalejunkie needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 585.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 585.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviews.scalejunkie.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (79%)
103
22
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews Scalejunkie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scalejunkie.com
265 ms
monetate.js
191 ms
application.css
60 ms
ng-modal.css
39 ms
angular.min.js
60 ms
ng-modal.js
37 ms
google_analytics.js
37 ms
google_oauth.js
40 ms
bold_chat.js
44 ms
eloqua.js
44 ms
hotjar.js
41 ms
adroll.js
50 ms
impactRadius.js
49 ms
in.js
54 ms
api.js
58 ms
api:client.js
81 ms
app.js
46 ms
cookies.js
46 ms
socialMedia.js
50 ms
countryDropdown.js
49 ms
monetate.js
48 ms
index.js
48 ms
lander.js
50 ms
seoPages.js
50 ms
sitePages.js
49 ms
search.js
48 ms
modal.js
47 ms
forms.js
49 ms
tldSelector.js
49 ms
setFixedTop.js
49 ms
searchBar.js
50 ms
currency.js
48 ms
trust.js
48 ms
conversion.js
36 ms
lander-v2.css
48 ms
tdfs-inner.css
49 ms
tdfs-temp.css
49 ms
thankyou.css
49 ms
entry.js
10 ms
custom.js
14 ms
css
26 ms
fontawesome.min.css
13 ms
bd-icons.min.css
15 ms
ga.js
19 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
63 ms
userspace
245 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
60 ms
recaptcha__en.js
296 ms
all.js
29 ms
ss-social-regular.css
51 ms
css
50 ms
logo-header-2x.png
46 ms
__utm.gif
270 ms
__utm.gif
235 ms
362 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
224 ms
postmessageRelay
319 ms
1310522409-0
244 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
123 ms
236 ms
hotjar-10205.js
228 ms
elqCfg.min.js
71 ms
__utm.gif
61 ms
xd_arbiter.php
95 ms
xd_arbiter.php
182 ms
framework
69 ms
collect
160 ms
57 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
60 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
123 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
125 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
128 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
59 ms
anchor
103 ms
svrGP
279 ms
svrGP
210 ms
iframe
107 ms
1310522409-1
32 ms
styles__ltr.css
32 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
116 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
105 ms
2172305219-idpiframe.js
110 ms
xd_arbiter.php
61 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
151 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
64 ms
webworker.js
66 ms
logo_48.png
61 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
105 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
106 ms
svrGP.aspx
64 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
56 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
svrGP.aspx
42 ms
iframerpc
26 ms
vms.js
85 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
roundtrip.js
9 ms
6ESKICLQUVAGDN5NI2ETS4.js
40 ms
bc.pv
107 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
8 ms
out
8 ms
32 ms
11 ms
24 ms
out
12 ms
out
12 ms
out
20 ms
out
19 ms
out
23 ms
out
23 ms
out
23 ms
out
24 ms
17 ms
16 ms
u.php
80 ms
sync
16 ms
adsct
112 ms
pixel
55 ms
47 ms
bounce
12 ms
377928.gif
9 ms
u.php
75 ms
u.php
78 ms
tap.php
18 ms
u.php
80 ms
sd
34 ms
in
5 ms
reviews.scalejunkie.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
reviews.scalejunkie.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
reviews.scalejunkie.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviews.scalejunkie.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviews.scalejunkie.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviews.scalejunkie.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviews Scalejunkie. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: