Tools & Wizards About Us
safe-killer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

safe-killer.com

Ant, Cockroach, Flea, Mosquito & Mouse Killer China Supplier - Safe-Killer.com

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

368 ms

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

safe-killer.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Safe Killer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about safe-killer.com

Safe Killer supply ant, cockroach, flea, mosquito & mouse safty killer. We also supply custom packaging for your business.

Visit safe-killer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Safe-killer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

safe-killer.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

safe-killer.com

39 ms

safe-killer.com

47 ms

post-6.css

15 ms

post-9.css

38 ms

post-25.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Safe-killer.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain Safe-killer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 252.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Safe-killer.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 209.2 kB

  • Original 253.1 kB
  • After minification 249.0 kB
  • After compression 44.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 40.7 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safe Killer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 347.6 kB
  • After minification 347.6 kB
  • After compression 345.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 471 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safe-killer.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (59%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safe Killer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

safe-killer.com

safe-killer.com

39 ms

safe-killer.com

safe-killer.com

47 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

15 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

38 ms

post-25.css

post-25.css

41 ms

post-123.css

post-123.css

34 ms

post-564.css

post-564.css

29 ms

f301898d4c80.google-fonts.min.css

f301898d4c80.google-fonts.min.css

42 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

16 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

37 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

76 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

74 ms

pminstantpage.min.js

pminstantpage.min.js

75 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

75 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

86 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

106 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

129 ms

popup.js

popup.js

106 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

106 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

106 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

104 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

107 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

106 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

106 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

112 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

206 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

121 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

114 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

118 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

logo3-e1621991963703.png

logo3-e1621991963703.png

146 ms

Pest-Control-Equipment-4.jpg

Pest-Control-Equipment-4.jpg

68 ms

safe-killer-13.jpg

safe-killer-13.jpg

74 ms

safe-killer-14.jpg

safe-killer-14.jpg

77 ms

CHONG4.png

CHONG4.png

77 ms

CHONG1.png

CHONG1.png

95 ms

Safe-Pest-Killers-1.jpeg

Safe-Pest-Killers-1.jpeg

97 ms

CHONG3.png

CHONG3.png

60 ms

CHONG2.png

CHONG2.png

61 ms

Pest-Control-Equipment-6.jpg

Pest-Control-Equipment-6.jpg

104 ms

Pest-Control-Equipment-9.jpg

Pest-Control-Equipment-9.jpg

106 ms

humane-mouse-trap-1.jpg

humane-mouse-trap-1.jpg

104 ms

Folding-fly-trap-2.jpg

Folding-fly-trap-2.jpg

173 ms

ok-3-1-300x176.webp

ok-3-1-300x176.webp

160 ms

ok-1-2-300x176.webp

ok-1-2-300x176.webp

180 ms

ok-1-2-2-300x176.webp

ok-1-2-2-300x176.webp

171 ms

logo3-e1621991963703-1024x192.png

logo3-e1621991963703-1024x192.png

107 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

safe-killer.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

safe-killer.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

safe-killer.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safe-killer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safe-killer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

safe-killer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Safe Killer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: