1.3 sec in total
63 ms
758 ms
442 ms
Welcome to safe.searchprotection.online homepage info - get ready to check Safe Search Protection best content right away, or after learning these important things about safe.searchprotection.online
Latest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!
Visit safe.searchprotection.onlineWe analyzed Safe.searchprotection.online page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
safe.searchprotection.online performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value2,840 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
63 ms
266 ms
94 ms
94 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Safe.searchprotection.online, 90% (62 requests) were made to S.yimg.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (266 ms) relates to the external source Yahoo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 980.3 kB (48%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Safe.searchprotection.online main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 974.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 974.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safe Search Protection images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 36 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safe.searchprotection.online has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
62
27
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safe Search Protection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
safe.searchprotection.online
63 ms
www.yahoo.com
266 ms
cmp.js
94 ms
tdv2-wafer-utils.customErrorHandler.bcda778b736c3a054af62f437b536e78.js
94 ms
fpDesktop.907c8bf6c67491b309a489c75f65f939.js
95 ms
benji-1.0.150.js
102 ms
wf-caas-1.35.4.js
102 ms
wf-toggle-1.15.4.js
102 ms
react-wafer-featurebar.custom.default.95a7979b4c06295e22960043d003fb49.js
101 ms
wf-clipboard-copy-1.0.2.js
101 ms
wf-video-3.1.0.js
102 ms
wf-bind-1.1.3.js
105 ms
wf-text-1.2.0.js
104 ms
wf-action-1.8.1.js
105 ms
wf-template-1.4.3.js
104 ms
wf-menu-1.3.0.js
105 ms
wf-fetch-1.19.1.js
105 ms
wf-beacon-1.3.4.js
112 ms
wf-benji-1.1.3.js
112 ms
wf-form-1.34.5.js
113 ms
wf-countdown-1.2.5.js
113 ms
wf-scrollview-2.22.3.js
111 ms
wf-lightbox-1.10.6.js
111 ms
wf-native-da-1.0.4.js
114 ms
wf-image-1.4.0.js
114 ms
wf-rapid-1.10.8.js
130 ms
react-wafer-stream.custom.default.34fba140d46159f80d116c63459e57e7.js
113 ms
1c46596.caas-news_web.min.js
130 ms
cerebro_min.js
56 ms
privacy-choice-control.png
50 ms
Regular.woff
56 ms
Medium.woff
57 ms
Light.woff
60 ms
ExtraLight.woff
22 ms
Semibold.woff
60 ms
2f46a470-c213-11ee-96b3-dcadec8fded7.cf.jpg
52 ms
c91d7d90-c21c-11ee-aef7-e670f0af60da.cf.jpg
48 ms
8e589900-c24f-11ee-bdff-3d89807f2396.cf.jpg
50 ms
f3393590-c1dd-11ee-a6bf-815dfbde9c70.cf.jpg
54 ms
05b6a8c0-c1f1-11ee-bf37-0f04fbbf1823.cf.jpg
53 ms
f88dc0c0-c1cd-11ee-aac6-1b5c0c200f91.cf.jpg
53 ms
trendingNow.yhome-atomic.66d98e4cd448c48e1f6c4e2e2d0a34a6.min.css
22 ms
trendingNow-flameIcon.yhome-variable.a2368adb8251677d29ac1399a6f34c43.min.css
20 ms
rapid-3.53.38.js
20 ms
wf-core-1.65.0.js
97 ms
homepage-pwa-defer-1.1.6.js
96 ms
safe.min.js
124 ms
advertisement_0.0.19.js
144 ms
2a94fc133f5818ba3416e39c6669ad56.cf.jpg
142 ms
e19a5d74d7cdc61c9e8e6b9bd75c2685.cf.jpg
142 ms
7ef485ddc6a0a8723ee74ecf6869b6ce.cf.jpg
144 ms
a6568156cec1f5ad0eb8898ac725c536.cf.jpg
142 ms
1b32d7a3953acd8c239aeefb960e1031.cf.jpg
144 ms
138a5481f6322cacab9b02462f29060e.cf.jpg
146 ms
d8d5edf741a736f7ef59bbe3501e5f83.cf.jpg
144 ms
cc3d4f44fea912f2bab3936e2434fb08.cf.jpg
146 ms
c28b22837731d2cfe0a0a7ca664354b0.cf.jpg
147 ms
ccba46dd8beb9e6e518210419e4828dd.cf.jpg
149 ms
2521fc6ef3c6b38ac43102d6aaa9c05f.cf.jpg
147 ms
d6c89760-8fca-11ee-865a-8a11f7bd97c9.cf.jpg
150 ms
4449ebd4ee69d2432bd47b3b5ccfe9d5.cf.jpg
150 ms
40cbd66bfd494af8c1d629503e0b1591.cf.jpg
150 ms
011440e0680eb9bb59ddc718b26c8ce2.cf.jpg
150 ms
__rapid-worker-1.2.js
213 ms
cs_1.5.1.js
184 ms
evplayer.js
92 ms
exp.json
13 ms
perf-vitals_3.2.0.js
28 ms
p
78 ms
safe.searchprotection.online accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
safe.searchprotection.online best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
safe.searchprotection.online SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safe.searchprotection.online can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safe.searchprotection.online main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
safe.searchprotection.online
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Safe Search Protection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: