4.2 sec in total
316 ms
2.9 sec
910 ms
Welcome to safeex.com homepage info - get ready to check Safe Ex best content for Malaysia right away, or after learning these important things about safeex.com
Flexible and configurable maintenance management software that facilitates your inspection and maintenance operations. Book Demo Now!
Visit safeex.comWe analyzed Safeex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
safeex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value3,080 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
316 ms
614 ms
568 ms
381 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Safeex.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Safeex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (57%)
2.0 MB
852.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Safeex.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 795.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 156.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safe Ex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 553.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 553.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 391.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safeex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 391.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (75%)
63
16
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safe Ex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
safeex.com
316 ms
www.safeex.com
614 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
568 ms
style-main-new.min.css
381 ms
style.min.css
289 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
384 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
568 ms
swiper.min.css
387 ms
post-12.css
475 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
478 ms
style.min.css
574 ms
post-147.css
577 ms
post-3992.css
581 ms
css
33 ms
style.min.css
658 ms
css
43 ms
fontawesome.min.css
755 ms
solid.min.css
668 ms
brands.min.css
669 ms
loader
164 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
666 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
750 ms
post-7576.css
860 ms
animations.min.css
861 ms
frontend.js
861 ms
script.js
956 ms
front-end.js
954 ms
complianz.min.js
954 ms
jquery.min.js
1082 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
953 ms
lottie.min.js
1497 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1048 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1049 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1047 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1226 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1214 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1213 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1331 ms
hooks.min.js
1231 ms
i18n.min.js
1232 ms
frontend.min.js
1403 ms
loader.min.js
49 ms
waypoints.min.js
1046 ms
core.min.js
955 ms
frontend.min.js
954 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1045 ms
underscore.min.js
959 ms
wp-util.min.js
957 ms
frontend.min.js
875 ms
gtm.js
201 ms
lftracker_v1_Xbp1oaEoELy7EdVj.js
469 ms
cropped-SafeEx_Logo_Web.png
768 ms
safeex-cloud-system.png
808 ms
checklist-4.jpg
905 ms
training.jpg
768 ms
Haztech_image_01.jpg
768 ms
Technician-holding-tablet-radio.jpg
891 ms
total.webp
794 ms
petronas.webp
818 ms
haztech.webp
819 ms
seadrill.webp
836 ms
SafeEx_Logo_Web_white_02.png
848 ms
SafeEx_Logo_pop_up_complianz.jpg
859 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
83 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
84 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
122 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
137 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
138 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
139 ms
thought.bubble-4.svg
807 ms
eicons.woff
1020 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
840 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
939 ms
js
74 ms
tr.lfeeder.com
43 ms
safeex.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
safeex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
safeex.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safeex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safeex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
safeex.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Safe Ex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: