Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

sam.no

Stempler, svijern, skilt SAM Produkter AS - Stempelfabrikken

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

370 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

281 ms

sam.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SAM content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sam.no

Nettbutikk for kontor stempler, svijern, skilt, samt messe og displayutstyr. Rask levering. Stort lager i Oslo.

Visit sam.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Sam.no page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sam.no performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.951

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sam.no

370 ms

www.sam.no

847 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

css

848 ms

jquery

745 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Sam.no, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (996 ms) belongs to the original domain Sam.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 356.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

797.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Sam.no main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 673.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 36.5 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.2 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 24.9 kB

  • Original 673.3 kB
  • After minification 648.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SAM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 289.9 kB

  • Original 430.8 kB
  • After minification 430.1 kB
  • After compression 140.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (30%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sam.no accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sam.no best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sam.no SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sam.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sam.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SAM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: