Tools & Wizards About Us
samport.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

samport.no

Betalingsløsninger for din bedrift - raskt og enkelt | Bambora

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

432 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

283 ms

samport.no screenshot

About Website

Visit samport.no now to see the best up-to-date Samport content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about samport.no

Bambora tilbyr enkle betalingsløsninger for butikk & online. Enkel å bruke både for deg og kundene dine. Raske og sikkre betalinger. La oss starte!

Visit samport.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Samport.no page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

samport.no performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

samport-no

432 ms

a288b518-d444-43f6-ad00-1a4ce223f4c3.css

58 ms

fonts.css

675 ms

styles

253 ms

top

318 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Samport.no, 22% (4 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 17% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (884 ms) relates to the external source Bambora.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.8 kB (54%)

Content Size

112.3 kB

After Optimization

51.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Samport.no main page is 112.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 64.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 13.9 kB
  • After minification 13.6 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 61% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 33.5 kB

  • Original 64.6 kB
  • After minification 64.6 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Samport.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Samport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

samport-no

samport-no

432 ms

a288b518-d444-43f6-ad00-1a4ce223f4c3.css

a288b518-d444-43f6-ad00-1a4ce223f4c3.css

58 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

675 ms

styles

styles

253 ms

top

top

318 ms

bottom

bottom

454 ms

FDB3B09340299F61F.css

FDB3B09340299F61F.css

884 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

76 ms

svg-symbols.svg

svg-symbols.svg

302 ms

bcf54343-d033-41ee-bbd7-2b77df3fe7ba.woff

bcf54343-d033-41ee-bbd7-2b77df3fe7ba.woff

49 ms

60be5c39-863e-40cb-9434-6ebafb62ab2b.woff

60be5c39-863e-40cb-9434-6ebafb62ab2b.woff

84 ms

14ff6081-326d-4dae-b778-d7afa66166fc.woff

14ff6081-326d-4dae-b778-d7afa66166fc.woff

72 ms

u+PBDyX8BpDY+jA==

u+PBDyX8BpDY+jA==

46 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

5 ms

ec.js

ec.js

9 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

17 ms

SEO Factors

samport.no SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NN

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Samport.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Samport.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

samport.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Samport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: