2.3 sec in total
67 ms
2 sec
238 ms
Visit sandsoil.com now to see the best up-to-date Sand Soil content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sandsoil.com
Get The Prices That Fits Your Budget. (504) 355-9000. Buy Bulk Save Big! Shop Your Top Soil Online Prompt Delivery. Broad Selection of Affordable, High-Quality Bulk Delivery Products For Any Project.
Visit sandsoil.comWe analyzed Sandsoil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
sandsoil.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.7 s
2/100
10%
67 ms
219 ms
275 ms
33 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sandsoil.com, 70% (62 requests) were made to Sandnsoil.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Sandnsoil.com.
Page size can be reduced by 434.3 kB (21%)
2.1 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Sandsoil.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.6 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sand Soil images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 45.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 317.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sandsoil.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 317.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (60%)
77
31
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sand Soil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sandsoil.com
67 ms
www.sandnsoil.com
219 ms
sandnsoil.com
275 ms
css
33 ms
reset.css
56 ms
bootstrap.min.css
118 ms
font-awesome.min.css
170 ms
animate.css
180 ms
style.css
186 ms
New_style.css
182 ms
datepicker.css
184 ms
media-query.css
182 ms
navigation.css
223 ms
zebra_datepicker.css
235 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
23 ms
style2.css
235 ms
settings.css
238 ms
responsive.css
236 ms
jquery-3.7.1.min.js
296 ms
jquery.maskedinput.js
277 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
23 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
287 ms
jquery.appear.js
287 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
290 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
289 ms
jquery.isotope.js
388 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
387 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
479 ms
jquery.sticky.js
387 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
386 ms
zebra_datepicker.src.js
386 ms
bootstrap.min.js
486 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
486 ms
modernizr.custom.js
478 ms
googleAutoCompleteForm.js
478 ms
myScript.js
478 ms
js
105 ms
snap.svg-min.js
606 ms
classie.js
665 ms
main4.js
586 ms
scripts.js
605 ms
gtm.js
119 ms
aa--rvkVrp4
206 ms
logoc.png
346 ms
logo_A.png
287 ms
open_menu.png
530 ms
TRUKS-min.jpg
835 ms
spillway-dirt-delivery-Metairie-La.jpg
833 ms
TRUCK.jpg
834 ms
Family-Business.jpg
904 ms
Vic.png
530 ms
Woman_Avatar.png
695 ms
Morales.png
696 ms
Man_Avatar.png
833 ms
Unknow_user.png
833 ms
icon_on.png
904 ms
a.png
904 ms
s_icon1.png
903 ms
s_icon2.png
905 ms
s_icon3.png
904 ms
s_icon4.png
961 ms
s_icon5.png
960 ms
icon.png
960 ms
icon2.png
901 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
105 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1007 ms
icon3.png
897 ms
map.jpg
1010 ms
logo_man.png
994 ms
js
54 ms
js
257 ms
www-player.css
76 ms
www-embed-player.js
210 ms
base.js
340 ms
448 ms
431 ms
bar1.png
673 ms
UyQhPWNsNa0oRkd8oSQlA6PkpWpORMW0CLBRczdusu0.js
157 ms
embed.js
54 ms
148 ms
258 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
14 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
15 ms
Create
153 ms
sandsoil.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sandsoil.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
sandsoil.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sandsoil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sandsoil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sandsoil.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sand Soil. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: