Tools & Wizards About Us
sanskrit.bg screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

sanskrit.bg

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

621 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

427 ms

sanskrit.bg screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sanskrit.bg homepage info - get ready to check Sanskrit best content right away, or after learning these important things about sanskrit.bg

Translation agency certification and legalization. Speed and accuracy comprehensive service affordable rates.

Visit sanskrit.bg

Key Findings

We analyzed Sanskrit.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sanskrit.bg performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

621 ms

8b2fd.css

353 ms

8b2fd.css

474 ms

8b2fd.css

461 ms

post-843.css

345 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Sanskrit.bg, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Sanskrit.bg.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

824.7 kB

After Optimization

716.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sanskrit.bg main page is 824.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 307.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 106.6 kB

  • Original 130.4 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 307.5 kB
  • After minification 307.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sanskrit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 239.6 kB
  • After minification 239.6 kB
  • After compression 238.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 806 B

  • Original 147.2 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB
  • After compression 146.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sanskrit.bg has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (87%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sanskrit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

621 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

353 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

474 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

461 ms

post-843.css

post-843.css

345 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

585 ms

post-1085.css

post-1085.css

349 ms

post-1253.css

post-1253.css

609 ms

post-1248.css

post-1248.css

687 ms

style.css

style.css

690 ms

css

css

41 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

734 ms

8b2fd.js

8b2fd.js

918 ms

8b2fd.css

8b2fd.css

958 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

974 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

1079 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

1078 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1095 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

1497 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1280 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1410 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1381 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1396 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1556 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

1630 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

1731 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1757 ms

helper.min.js

helper.min.js

1753 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1839 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1904 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1983 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2073 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2097 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2125 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

3600 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

2252 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

2338 ms

64857.jpg

64857.jpg

1928 ms

3440165.jpg

3440165.jpg

1834 ms

font

font

18 ms

font

font

94 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1507 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1850 ms

font

font

44 ms

Accessibility Review

sanskrit.bg accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sanskrit.bg best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sanskrit.bg SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    BG

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sanskrit.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Sanskrit.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sanskrit.bg

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sanskrit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: