11.4 sec in total
335 ms
4.7 sec
6.4 sec
Visit sapphire-solar.com now to see the best up-to-date Sapphire Solar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sapphire-solar.com
Visit sapphire-solar.comWe analyzed Sapphire-solar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
sapphire-solar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value14,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
335 ms
261 ms
287 ms
359 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Sapphire-solar.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Connect.podium.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sapphire-solar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 304.0 kB (8%)
3.7 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Sapphire-solar.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sapphire Solar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 602 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 206 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sapphire-solar.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (63%)
32
12
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sapphire Solar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sapphire-solar.com
335 ms
styles.css
261 ms
slick.min.css
287 ms
font-awesome.min.css
359 ms
deprecated-style.min.css
261 ms
style.min.css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
419 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
321 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
575 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
580 ms
public.js
1266 ms
et-core-unified-10.min.css
590 ms
email-decode.min.js
357 ms
widget.js
62 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
682 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
669 ms
index.js
888 ms
slick.min.js
850 ms
sp-slick-active.min.js
850 ms
scripts.min.js
946 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
976 ms
common.js
1144 ms
gtm.js
98 ms
app3433s23.jpg
167 ms
Sapphire-Solar-Logo.png
1297 ms
Sapphire-Solar-Logo-crispy.png
1282 ms
Solar-Battery-VPP-House.jpg
342 ms
AdobeStock_314240142-scaled.jpeg
299 ms
Logos2.jpg
2213 ms
sonnen_logo_hor_gross.png
353 ms
Logos4.jpg
569 ms
AdobeStock_259480361-scaled.jpeg
2210 ms
Solar-house-2-v2-Updated-1-1.png
1248 ms
modules.ttf
2160 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-49575-tb-50179-10-late.css
1467 ms
sapphire-solar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sapphire-solar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sapphire-solar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sapphire-solar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sapphire-solar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sapphire-solar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sapphire Solar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: