7.8 sec in total
443 ms
4.8 sec
2.5 sec
Visit saratogaliving.com now to see the best up-to-date Saratoga Living content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about saratogaliving.com
Saratoga Living is the premier lifestyle media company in Saratoga Springs and New York’s Capital Region. We celebrate the extraordinary, the can-do spirit and the undeniable magic that our beautiful ...
Visit saratogaliving.comWe analyzed Saratogaliving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 443 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
saratogaliving.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value24.8 s
0/100
25%
Value28.1 s
0/100
10%
Value21,330 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.357
30/100
15%
Value32.6 s
0/100
10%
443 ms
219 ms
285 ms
295 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Saratogaliving.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Saratogaliving.com.
Page size can be reduced by 200.0 kB (6%)
3.1 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Saratogaliving.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Saratoga Living images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 207 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saratogaliving.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (80%)
61
12
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saratoga Living. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
saratogaliving.com
443 ms
js
219 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
285 ms
flick.css
295 ms
saratogaliving.com
383 ms
style.min.css
383 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
404 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
404 ms
wpp.css
297 ms
font-awesome.min.css
521 ms
app.css
611 ms
css
269 ms
js_composer.min.css
530 ms
jquery.min.js
452 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
456 ms
scrollTo.js
725 ms
jquery.form.min.js
727 ms
mailchimp.js
740 ms
core.min.js
738 ms
datepicker.js
738 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
749 ms
wpp.min.js
724 ms
advanced.min.js
729 ms
jquery.min.js
274 ms
email-decode.min.js
704 ms
lazysizes.min.js
704 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
766 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
705 ms
js.cookie.min.js
705 ms
woocommerce.min.js
705 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
707 ms
advanced-ads-pro.min.js
1089 ms
underscore.min.js
718 ms
vendor.min.js
1096 ms
app.min.js
822 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
823 ms
analytics.js
69 ms
collect
90 ms
collect
271 ms
gtm.js
45 ms
fbevents.js
97 ms
DSC04416-1-20x10.jpg
242 ms
AlexZhang_D3I_1385-20x10.jpg
533 ms
showcaswshowpiece_22060601-006-20x10.jpg
242 ms
marketfutures-20x15.jpg
243 ms
sl_BestOf_featuredimage.jpg
527 ms
IMG_2460-20x15.jpg
528 ms
web_Kennison-Robert-Stone-RRS_7025-20x15.jpg
528 ms
Untitled-design-16-20x15.jpg
532 ms
AlexZhang_D3I_1385-20x15.jpg
3137 ms
showcaswshowpiece_22060601-006-20x15.jpg
600 ms
ck-2-20x15.jpg
601 ms
MarylouW_2015-Travers_LWhite.jpg
633 ms
Beekman-1802_Web.jpg
3159 ms
MarylouWhitneyJohnH_SirosCup_Web.jpg
694 ms
DaveMatthews_web.jpg
3133 ms
jim-dandy-1441-4.jpg
3137 ms
identity.js
6 ms
289016568623694
255 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2893 ms
invisible.js
283 ms
saratogaliving.com
2758 ms
openbridge_plugin.js
265 ms
saratogaliving.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
saratogaliving.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
saratogaliving.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Saratogaliving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Saratogaliving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
saratogaliving.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Saratoga Living. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: