Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

sarockdigest.com

The South African Rock Music Digest

Page Load Speed

22.9 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

21.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

sarockdigest.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sarockdigest.com now to see the best up-to-date Sa Rock Digest content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sarockdigest.com

The South African Rock Music Digest

Visit sarockdigest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sarockdigest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 22.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

sarockdigest.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,970 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sarockdigest.com

234 ms

style.css

41 ms

brand

18 ms

1001SASongs

87 ms

show_ads.js

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Sarockdigest.com, 19% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 19% (21 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Etrader.kalahari.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Sarockdigest.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sa Rock Digest images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 399 B

  • Original 32.3 kB
  • After minification 32.2 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 145.7 kB

  • Original 356.6 kB
  • After minification 355.7 kB
  • After compression 210.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sarockdigest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.7 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (44%)

Requests Now

104

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sa Rock Digest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sarockdigest.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sarockdigest.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sarockdigest.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sarockdigest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sarockdigest.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sa Rock Digest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: