2.1 sec in total
607 ms
1.2 sec
317 ms
Welcome to sax.net homepage info - get ready to check Sax best content right away, or after learning these important things about sax.net
Visit sax.netWe analyzed Sax.net page load time and found that the first response time was 607 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
sax.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
607 ms
25 ms
51 ms
53 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Sax.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Assets.zendesk.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (607 ms) belongs to the original domain Sax.net.
Page size can be reduced by 331.4 kB (66%)
500.8 kB
169.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sax.net main page is 500.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 317.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sax needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 210.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sax.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (71%)
70
20
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sax.net
607 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
25 ms
colorbox.css
51 ms
flexslider.css
53 ms
reset.css
53 ms
screen.css
54 ms
element.css
64 ms
media-queries.css
67 ms
style.css
68 ms
modernizr.custom.js
73 ms
respond.min.js
76 ms
jquery.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
grizzly-app-dock.js
81 ms
zenbox.js
76 ms
comment-reply.min.js
81 ms
jquery.form.min.js
84 ms
jquery.metadata.js
85 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
136 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
137 ms
supersubs.js
144 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
145 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
145 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.js
150 ms
jquery.retina-0.1.js
152 ms
html5.js
152 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
156 ms
bootstrap-twipsy.js
157 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
163 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
169 ms
jquery.bgpos.js
169 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
171 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
231 ms
grizzly-core.js
231 ms
wp-embed.min.js
231 ms
webfont.js
71 ms
ga.js
57 ms
zenbox.css
119 ms
title-sep.png
120 ms
email-dark.png
119 ms
twitter-dark.png
119 ms
linkedin-dark.png
123 ms
instagram-dark.png
124 ms
apple-dark.png
122 ms
footer-shadow.png
122 ms
sax.net
386 ms
shadow-left.png
121 ms
shadow-body.png
380 ms
shadow-right.png
380 ms
bg-shadow.png
376 ms
pixcel.png
373 ms
wood.png
373 ms
table-top-shadow.png
382 ms
black-border.png
376 ms
table-body-shadow.png
370 ms
mat-body-side-shadow.png
370 ms
table-shadow.png
369 ms
date-black.png
367 ms
category-black.png
370 ms
chess.png
363 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
css
27 ms
feedback.png
249 ms
close_big.png
221 ms
loading.html
239 ms
gegTSDBDs5le3g6uxU1ZsYB9a16epZVaac-gfobfbfA.ttf
202 ms
app-prev-light.png
53 ms
app-next-light.png
54 ms
overlay.png
55 ms
border.png
55 ms
controls.png
71 ms
load_large.gif
29 ms
sax.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
sax.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
sax.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sax.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sax.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sax.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: