Tools & Wizards About Us
scamguard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

scamguard.com

ScamGuard™ - Always a step ahead of scams!

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

913 ms

scamguard.com screenshot

About Website

Visit scamguard.com now to see the best up-to-date Scam Guard content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scamguard.com

At ScamGuard™, we use AI to uncover and prevent scams, offering consumers a powerful tool for reporting and investigating online fraud. Protect yourself against malicious websites with our expert guid...

Visit scamguard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scamguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scamguard.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.137

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scamguard.com

49 ms

scamguard.com

761 ms

jquery.min.js

29 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

45 ms

lazysizes.min.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Scamguard.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Scamguard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (57%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Scamguard.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 260.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 55.7 kB

  • Original 475.1 kB
  • After minification 419.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scam Guard needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 458.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 839.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 458.8 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (82%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scam Guard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scamguard.com

scamguard.com

49 ms

scamguard.com

scamguard.com

761 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

29 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

45 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

25 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

162 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

60 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

291 ms

ajax-unit-loading.min.js

ajax-unit-loading.min.js

78 ms

index.js

index.js

77 ms

index.js

index.js

77 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

320 ms

iframe-height-adjuster.min.js

iframe-height-adjuster.min.js

178 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

371 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

179 ms

sweetalert2.min.js

sweetalert2.min.js

178 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

177 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

179 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

182 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

179 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

437 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

545 ms

wp-pointer.min.js

wp-pointer.min.js

182 ms

pointer-tooltip.min.js

pointer-tooltip.min.js

196 ms

product-tooltip.min.js

product-tooltip.min.js

200 ms

product-image-preview.min.js

product-image-preview.min.js

475 ms

api.js

api.js

180 ms

index.js

index.js

215 ms

wply.min.js

wply.min.js

541 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

330 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

341 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

355 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

369 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

666 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

386 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

410 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

790 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

666 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

699 ms

hands-small.jpg

hands-small.jpg

1180 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

479 ms

sg-new-G-RED-LIGHT.svg

sg-new-G-RED-LIGHT.svg

683 ms

whistle1-scaled.jpg

whistle1-scaled.jpg

1076 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

30 ms

ads

ads

222 ms

ca-pub-6306449039720879

ca-pub-6306449039720879

72 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

21 ms

createClient.php

createClient.php

272 ms

addData.php

addData.php

203 ms

Accessibility Review

scamguard.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

scamguard.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

scamguard.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scamguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scamguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scamguard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scam Guard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: