5 sec in total
175 ms
4.5 sec
292 ms
Click here to check amazing Scandifile content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about scandifile.dk
Vores banebrydende Scandifile Sag/Journal for windows 10 registrerer, opretter, redigerer, distribuerer og sporer oplysninger problemfrit, samtidig med at dokumentarkivering, hentning og kategoriserin...
Visit scandifile.dkWe analyzed Scandifile.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
scandifile.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
175 ms
35 ms
151 ms
187 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Scandifile.dk, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Usercontent.one. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Usercontent.one.
Page size can be reduced by 465.1 kB (28%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Scandifile.dk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 379.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scandifile needs image optimization as it can save up to 379.1 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scandifile.dk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (70%)
64
19
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scandifile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
175 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
151 ms
style.min.css
187 ms
mainstyles.css
178 ms
styles.css
179 ms
ssa-styles.css
212 ms
style.css
209 ms
base.css
244 ms
layout.css
359 ms
shortcodes.css
364 ms
animations.min.css
279 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
314 ms
prettyPhoto.css
315 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
334 ms
responsive.css
371 ms
style.css
420 ms
css
32 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
front.min.css
421 ms
jquery.min.js
438 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
447 ms
front.min.js
529 ms
js
74 ms
lftracker_v1_3P1w24d0ZWJ4mY5n.js
428 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
26 ms
js
52 ms
app.js
472 ms
index.js
474 ms
index.js
472 ms
core.min.js
476 ms
mouse.min.js
481 ms
sortable.min.js
539 ms
tabs.min.js
538 ms
accordion.min.js
572 ms
plugins.js
797 ms
menu.js
559 ms
animations.min.js
565 ms
jplayer.min.js
631 ms
translate3d.js
626 ms
scripts.js
655 ms
comment-reply.min.js
651 ms
api.js
57 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
675 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
713 ms
ga-audiences
25 ms
index.js
631 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
96 ms
scandifilelogo_281217_lille.png
427 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-03-13-at-13.21.22.png
594 ms
Scandifilelogo_imovie.gif
1868 ms
bagrkdoue.png
1954 ms
scandiplan_logo.png
684 ms
list_check.png
341 ms
list_star.png
345 ms
list_idea.png
381 ms
dk.png
419 ms
gb.png
420 ms
whatsapp-icon-square.svg
457 ms
js
49 ms
collect
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
10 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
13 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
22 ms
0FlJVP6Hrxmt7-fsUFhlFXNIlpcSwSrkTA-q.ttf
23 ms
0FlMVP6Hrxmt7-fsUFhlFXNIlpcaeg_0.ttf
23 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5Xs1Ug.ttf
21 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5Xs1Ug.ttf
23 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXs1Ug.ttf
23 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
23 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
24 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
24 ms
mfn-icons.woff
450 ms
recaptcha__en.js
48 ms
box_shadow.png
90 ms
g8pbiwuqv831o9jnrgnrkzcyr5aaxrbv.js
215 ms
g8pbiwuqv831o9jnrgnrkzcyr5aaxrbv.js
128 ms
scandifile.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scandifile.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
scandifile.dk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DA
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scandifile.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Scandifile.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scandifile.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scandifile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: