5.8 sec in total
1.4 sec
4 sec
347 ms
Visit scanshare.com now to see the best up-to-date Scanshare content for Netherlands and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about scanshare.com
Scanshare Applications B.V.
Visit scanshare.comWe analyzed Scanshare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
scanshare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value940 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
1439 ms
335 ms
222 ms
225 ms
288 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Scanshare.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Scanshare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (45%)
2.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Scanshare.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 436.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scanshare needs image optimization as it can save up to 436.0 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 419.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scanshare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
62
27
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scanshare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scanshare.com
1439 ms
bootstrap.min.css
335 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
222 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
225 ms
module_default.css
288 ms
default.css
302 ms
jquery.min.js
685 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
323 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
330 ms
caption.js
399 ms
bootstrap.min.js
596 ms
mootools-core.js
738 ms
core.js
477 ms
mootools-more.js
827 ms
acymailing_module.js
541 ms
stslidercontent.js
603 ms
galleria-1.2.8.min.js
808 ms
system.css
709 ms
general.css
718 ms
editor.css
808 ms
layout.css
822 ms
core_joomla.css
862 ms
responsive.css
863 ms
template.css
1000 ms
typography.css
1059 ms
style.css
1006 ms
avatar-template.js
994 ms
cookie.js
908 ms
system.css
129 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
go-to-top.png
108 ms
logo.png
172 ms
menu-icons.png
507 ms
nav-dot.png
145 ms
image-1.jpg
557 ms
image-2.jpg
460 ms
image-3.jpg
464 ms
image-4.jpg
681 ms
image-5.jpg
956 ms
icons.png
634 ms
GoogleAPInewsitem.JPG
639 ms
youth_570881_1280.jpg
765 ms
forum.JPG
762 ms
christmas-2016.jpg
1098 ms
veenman-news.jpg
891 ms
ChineseNews.JPG
989 ms
develop.png
896 ms
konica.png
897 ms
kyocera.png
1001 ms
lexmark.png
1002 ms
ricoh.png
1008 ms
samsung.png
1065 ms
sharp.png
1126 ms
toshiba.png
1110 ms
xerox.png
1113 ms
us.png
1120 ms
eu.png
1174 ms
de.png
1190 ms
au.png
1223 ms
icons.png
1421 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
30 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
31 ms
place
212 ms
collect
29 ms
jquery.min.js
25 ms
galleria.classic.js
119 ms
scanshare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scanshare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
scanshare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scanshare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scanshare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scanshare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scanshare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: