Tools & Wizards About Us
schaferreviews.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

schaferreviews.com

大切な人が亡くなったら行う葬儀について｜慌てずに見送り方を選ぶ

Page Load Speed

13.5 sec in total

First Response

5.1 sec

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

schaferreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Visit schaferreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Schaferreviews content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about schaferreviews.com

遺族が亡くなった場合、葬式を行なうため葬儀社に依頼しなくてはいけません。福岡の葬儀社では、葬儀を全てを準備してくれるので、助けられることが多いです。ですが、依頼する場合どのプランで行なうか遺族側決めなくてはいけないので、予算は早めに決めておきましょう。

Visit schaferreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Schaferreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.1 sec and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

schaferreviews.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

schaferreviews.com

5065 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

164 ms

css

22 ms

style.css

134 ms

shortcodes.css

202 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Schaferreviews.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Schaferreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 928.6 kB (44%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Schaferreviews.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 81.0 kB

  • Original 95.8 kB
  • After minification 88.3 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 303.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Schaferreviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 303.5 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 176.4 kB

  • Original 228.7 kB
  • After minification 183.4 kB
  • After compression 52.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 176.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 367.8 kB

  • Original 414.4 kB
  • After minification 369.8 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schaferreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 367.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (15%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

66

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schaferreviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

schaferreviews.com

schaferreviews.com

5065 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

164 ms

css

css

22 ms

style.css

style.css

134 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

202 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

137 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

182 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

183 ms

schema-style.css

schema-style.css

185 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

167 ms

custom.js

custom.js

191 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

218 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

223 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

317 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

426 ms

salvattore.min.js

salvattore.min.js

250 ms

main-styles.css

main-styles.css

379 ms

frontend-builder-style.css

frontend-builder-style.css

514 ms

JEFFRY-LOGO.jpg

JEFFRY-LOGO.jpg

107 ms

jeffry-schafer-reviews-masthead.jpg

jeffry-schafer-reviews-masthead.jpg

289 ms

103-400x114.png

103-400x114.png

160 ms

102-400x140.png

102-400x140.png

155 ms

101-400x108.png

101-400x108.png

154 ms

100-400x90.png

100-400x90.png

202 ms

99-400x106.png

99-400x106.png

203 ms

98-400x250.png

98-400x250.png

265 ms

97-400x152.png

97-400x152.png

220 ms

96-400x124.png

96-400x124.png

242 ms

95-400x94.png

95-400x94.png

243 ms

94-400x116.png

94-400x116.png

262 ms

93-400x110.png

93-400x110.png

286 ms

92-400x96.png

92-400x96.png

308 ms

91-400x86.png

91-400x86.png

334 ms

90-400x84.png

90-400x84.png

355 ms

89-400x94.png

89-400x94.png

354 ms

88-400x74.png

88-400x74.png

355 ms

87-400x70.png

87-400x70.png

369 ms

86-400x72.png

86-400x72.png

388 ms

85-400x68.jpg

85-400x68.jpg

613 ms

84-400x72.png

84-400x72.png

610 ms

83-400x82.png

83-400x82.png

607 ms

82-400x122.png

82-400x122.png

611 ms

81-400x78.png

81-400x78.png

605 ms

80-400x70.png

80-400x70.png

629 ms

79-400x86.png

79-400x86.png

701 ms

78-400x108.png

78-400x108.png

697 ms

77-400x96.png

77-400x96.png

698 ms

76-400x130.png

76-400x130.png

720 ms

75-400x100.png

75-400x100.png

699 ms

74-400x78.png

74-400x78.png

707 ms

73-400x82.png

73-400x82.png

768 ms

72-400x94.png

72-400x94.png

768 ms

71-400x116.png

71-400x116.png

777 ms

70-400x92.png

70-400x92.png

684 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

51 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

52 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

53 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

54 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

53 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

704 ms

69-400x88.png

69-400x88.png

655 ms

68-400x90.png

68-400x90.png

701 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

67-400x92.png

67-400x92.png

655 ms

66-400x90.png

66-400x90.png

686 ms

65-400x160.png

65-400x160.png

671 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

64-400x126.png

64-400x126.png

670 ms

63-400x94.png

63-400x94.png

703 ms

62-400x92.png

62-400x92.png

684 ms

61-400x124.png

61-400x124.png

682 ms

60-400x90.png

60-400x90.png

672 ms

59-400x176.png

59-400x176.png

677 ms

58-400x70.png

58-400x70.png

678 ms

57-400x90.png

57-400x90.png

697 ms

56-400x86.png

56-400x86.png

671 ms

55-400x82.png

55-400x82.png

670 ms

54-400x88.png

54-400x88.png

658 ms

53-400x100.png

53-400x100.png

686 ms

52-400x92.png

52-400x92.png

666 ms

51-400x250.png

51-400x250.png

709 ms

50-400x150.png

50-400x150.png

483 ms

49-400x250.png

49-400x250.png

628 ms

48-400x190.png

48-400x190.png

498 ms

47-400x250.png

47-400x250.png

577 ms

46-400x164.png

46-400x164.png

531 ms

45-400x242.png

45-400x242.png

541 ms

44-400x250.png

44-400x250.png

536 ms

SEO Factors

schaferreviews.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schaferreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Schaferreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

schaferreviews.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Schaferreviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: