Tools & Wizards About Us
schlipf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

schlipf.com

Ingenieurbüro Andreas Schlipf: - Prozessleittechnik: Beratung. Software. Support.

Page Load Speed

10.1 sec in total

First Response

250 ms

Resources Loaded

9.2 sec

Page Rendered

607 ms

schlipf.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to schlipf.com homepage info - get ready to check Schlipf best content right away, or after learning these important things about schlipf.com

Ihr Partner für individuelle Softwareentwicklung im Bereich der Prozessleittechnik und Prozessvisualisierung. Hier informieren >>

Visit schlipf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Schlipf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

schlipf.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.238

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

schlipf.com

250 ms

www.schlipf.com

663 ms

autoptimize_aaece4375ae1266251ba40eb7d54dd31.css

415 ms

autoptimize_single_a0e447a4dbaffbf96ffa70b838131396.css

298 ms

autoptimize_single_f0ab00951fa3efff62da26280f8a2bc2.css

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Schlipf.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Matomo.schlipf.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Matomo.schlipf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (35%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Schlipf.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 77.1 kB

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 98.5 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Schlipf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 988.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 409.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 988.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 415 B

  • Original 66.0 kB
  • After minification 66.0 kB
  • After compression 65.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Schlipf.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (18%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

73

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Schlipf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

schlipf.com

schlipf.com

250 ms

www.schlipf.com

www.schlipf.com

663 ms

autoptimize_aaece4375ae1266251ba40eb7d54dd31.css

autoptimize_aaece4375ae1266251ba40eb7d54dd31.css

415 ms

autoptimize_single_a0e447a4dbaffbf96ffa70b838131396.css

autoptimize_single_a0e447a4dbaffbf96ffa70b838131396.css

298 ms

autoptimize_single_f0ab00951fa3efff62da26280f8a2bc2.css

autoptimize_single_f0ab00951fa3efff62da26280f8a2bc2.css

306 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

588 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

329 ms

plyr.js

plyr.js

634 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

724 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

625 ms

karte.js

karte.js

1440 ms

index.js

index.js

368 ms

index.js

index.js

491 ms

popliup.min.js

popliup.min.js

525 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

580 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

684 ms

foundation.accordion.js

foundation.accordion.js

613 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

645 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

732 ms

custom.js

custom.js

682 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

423 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

678 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

133 ms

schlipf-logo_top-bar-mit-pfeil-400-1.png

schlipf-logo_top-bar-mit-pfeil-400-1.png

134 ms

slider-2-a-x.jpg

slider-2-a-x.jpg

360 ms

startseite-schlipf_LOGO-800px.png

startseite-schlipf_LOGO-800px.png

231 ms

wir_schlipf_2.jpg

wir_schlipf_2.jpg

424 ms

asc-screen-4-pfeile.png

asc-screen-4-pfeile.png

360 ms

ASC_Icons_730px-2021.png

ASC_Icons_730px-2021.png

361 ms

uebersicht_ASC-im-produktionsprozess_BLACK_2021.png

uebersicht_ASC-im-produktionsprozess_BLACK_2021.png

364 ms

Icon_Auftragsmanagement_43px.png

Icon_Auftragsmanagement_43px.png

362 ms

Icon_Material-Datenfluss_43px.png

Icon_Material-Datenfluss_43px.png

424 ms

Icon_Ereigniserfassung_43px.png

Icon_Ereigniserfassung_43px.png

439 ms

Icon_Performance-Indicator-Module_43px.png

Icon_Performance-Indicator-Module_43px.png

438 ms

Icon_Prozessvisualisierung_43px.png

Icon_Prozessvisualisierung_43px.png

438 ms

Icon_ASCO-Vision-43px.png

Icon_ASCO-Vision-43px.png

557 ms

team-schlipf-2-2021-500x325.jpg

team-schlipf-2-2021-500x325.jpg

522 ms

team-reitzammer-2-2021-500x325.jpg

team-reitzammer-2-2021-500x325.jpg

528 ms

team-zeidler-2021-500x325.jpg

team-zeidler-2021-500x325.jpg

530 ms

team-weiss-2021-500x325.jpg

team-weiss-2021-500x325.jpg

550 ms

team-salah-500x325.jpg

team-salah-500x325.jpg

565 ms

Ziegler_naturheld_Produktionsbild_klein.jpg

Ziegler_naturheld_Produktionsbild_klein.jpg

626 ms

ASCOVision_IngBASchlipf-350px.jpg

ASCOVision_IngBASchlipf-350px.jpg

655 ms

news-elefant-351x185.jpg

news-elefant-351x185.jpg

644 ms

work8-1.jpg

work8-1.jpg

784 ms

work6.jpg

work6.jpg

785 ms

projekte-thermopal-560x500.jpg

projekte-thermopal-560x500.jpg

719 ms

intranet-wissen-560x500.jpg

intranet-wissen-560x500.jpg

750 ms

slider-software.png

slider-software.png

754 ms

slider-prozessleitsysteme.png

slider-prozessleitsysteme.png

768 ms

slider-beratung.png

slider-beratung.png

826 ms

slider-visualisierungen.png

slider-visualisierungen.png

851 ms

slider-asc-suite.png

slider-asc-suite.png

859 ms

slider-datenbanken.png

slider-datenbanken.png

883 ms

slider-support.png

slider-support.png

897 ms

slider-schnittstellen.png

slider-schnittstellen.png

902 ms

schlipf-logo_300px.png

schlipf-logo_300px.png

936 ms

black_lozenge.png

black_lozenge.png

911 ms

tyger.woff

tyger.woff

945 ms

computer-3076956_1920.jpg

computer-3076956_1920.jpg

968 ms

overlay-pattern.png

overlay-pattern.png

769 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

666 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

693 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

714 ms

cbp-loading.gif

cbp-loading.gif

862 ms

marker.png

marker.png

802 ms

index.php

index.php

883 ms

index.php

index.php

848 ms

index.php

index.php

863 ms

index.php

index.php

841 ms

index.php

index.php

876 ms

index.php

index.php

835 ms

index.php

index.php

951 ms

index.php

index.php

967 ms

index.php

index.php

947 ms

index.php

index.php

977 ms

index.php

index.php

954 ms

index.php

index.php

943 ms

index.php

index.php

1021 ms

index.php

index.php

1014 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

3488 ms

index.php

index.php

974 ms

index.php

index.php

996 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

441 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

467 ms

index.php

index.php

539 ms

index.php

index.php

551 ms

index.php

index.php

565 ms

index.php

index.php

559 ms

index.php

index.php

558 ms

index.php

index.php

573 ms

index.php

index.php

558 ms

index.php

index.php

549 ms

Accessibility Review

schlipf.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

schlipf.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

schlipf.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Schlipf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Schlipf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

schlipf.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Schlipf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: