Tools & Wizards About Us
scissors.nu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

scissors.nu

SCISSORS HOMEPAGE

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

544 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

107 ms

scissors.nu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SCISSORS content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about scissors.nu

e e

Visit scissors.nu

Key Findings

We analyzed Scissors.nu page load time and found that the first response time was 544 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scissors.nu performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.394

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scissors.nu

544 ms

index1.html

361 ms

sabu.html

546 ms

sabu2.html

394 ms

po.gif

511 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Scissors.nu, 40% (8 requests) were made to Ejworks.info and 40% (8 requests) were made to Vc-net.ne.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) relates to the external source Vc-net.ne.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304 B (41%)

Content Size

741 B

After Optimization

437 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Scissors.nu main page is 741 B. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 741 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 304 B

  • Original 741 B
  • After minification 692 B
  • After compression 437 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 304 B or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SCISSORS. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

scissors.nu

scissors.nu

544 ms

index1.html

index1.html

361 ms

sabu.html

sabu.html

546 ms

sabu2.html

sabu2.html

394 ms

po.gif

po.gif

511 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

519 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

517 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

516 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

510 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

518 ms

count.cgi

count.cgi

658 ms

access2.cgi

access2.cgi

659 ms

close.html

close.html

302 ms

close.html

close.html

305 ms

close.html

close.html

298 ms

close.html

close.html

302 ms

close.html

close.html

303 ms

close.html

close.html

300 ms

close.html

close.html

302 ms

close.html

close.html

302 ms

Accessibility Review

scissors.nu accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

scissors.nu best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

scissors.nu SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scissors.nu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Scissors.nu main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

scissors.nu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SCISSORS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: