1.8 sec in total
145 ms
1.2 sec
466 ms
Welcome to scoutapm.com homepage info - get ready to check Scout APM best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about scoutapm.com
Get full visibility—without setting up three tools. The platform trusted by developers using Rails, Django, and more.
Visit scoutapm.comWe analyzed Scoutapm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
scoutapm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value3,420 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value21.4 s
1/100
10%
145 ms
299 ms
126 ms
37 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Scoutapm.com, 45% (26 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Consent.cookiebot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 253.6 kB (38%)
664.7 kB
411.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Scoutapm.com main page is 664.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 324.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scout APM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 97.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.8 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scoutapm.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (54%)
28
13
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scout APM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scoutapm.com
145 ms
scoutapm.com
299 ms
www.scoutapm.com
126 ms
css
37 ms
choices.min.css
17 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
59 ms
richtext.min.css
56 ms
content.min.css
69 ms
wpforms-modern-full.min.css
39 ms
uc.js
29 ms
cd.js
362 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
54 ms
scripts.min.js
89 ms
common.js
64 ms
sticky-elements.js
87 ms
gtm.js
288 ms
app.js
31 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-1905-tb-1816-1741-late.css
27 ms
scout-monitoring-logo-horizontal-full-color-orange.png
269 ms
cyber-security-17-1-e1712011684773.png
270 ms
metrics_overview_page.gif
267 ms
cyber-security-17-1-e1712012002673.png
270 ms
grizzly-labs-logo.jpeg
18 ms
cyber-security-16.png
275 ms
IETF-case-study-1.jpg
267 ms
metrics_endpoints_overview.gif
271 ms
grey_cncf_logo.svg
271 ms
2023_summer_g2_high_performer.svg
273 ms
21972-312_SOC_NonCPA.png
275 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSdgnk-DKQQ.woff
121 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSdSnk-DKQQ.woff
122 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmScMnk-DKQQ.woff
122 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSfSnk-DKQQ.woff
122 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSdSn0-DKQQ.woff
123 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSeMmU-DKQQ.woff
124 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSe1mU-DKQQ.woff
124 ms
xMQOuFFYT72X5wkB_18qmnndmSfSmU-DKQQ.woff
125 ms
modules.woff
104 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g0SOg35YZY.woff
161 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g0gOg35YZY.woff
170 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g1-Og35YZY.woff
245 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g2gOg35YZY.woff
169 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g0gOw35YZY.woff
161 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g3-PQ35YZY.woff
162 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g3HPQ35YZY.woff
199 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g2gPQ35YZY.woff
206 ms
jVyV7nvyB2HL8iZyDk4GVvSZ5MtC9g2JPQ35YZY.woff
205 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeeezUZyr2A.woff
206 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoedWzUZyr2A.woff
223 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeYuzUZyr2A.woff
250 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeVWzUZyr2A.woff
272 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoedWyUZyr2A.woff
286 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeQu0UZyr2A.woff
243 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeTK0UZyr2A.woff
265 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeVW0UZyr2A.woff
306 ms
jVyb7nvyB2HL8iZyJEc0qSzwj1Hs8RjoeXy0UZyr2A.woff
292 ms
cdreport.js
262 ms
scoutapm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scoutapm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
scoutapm.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scoutapm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scoutapm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scoutapm.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scout APM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: