Tools & Wizards About Us
screenbuzz.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

screenbuzz.co.uk

Screenbuzz is a creative, digital design agency based in Hampshire.

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

screenbuzz.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to screenbuzz.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Screenbuzz best content right away, or after learning these important things about screenbuzz.co.uk

Screenbuzz, a design agency based in Hampshire, specialising in branding, website design and print. We help to improve reputation and business performance.

Visit screenbuzz.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenbuzz.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenbuzz.co.uk performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value40.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value41,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.152

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.screenbuzz.co.uk

2018 ms

js_composer.min.css

413 ms

style.min.css

251 ms

styles.css

170 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

170 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Screenbuzz.co.uk, 23% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenbuzz.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 76.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

197.4 kB

After Optimization

120.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenbuzz.co.uk main page is 197.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 101.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 62.6 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 79.6 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10 B

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenbuzz images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 117 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 101.3 kB
  • After compression 87.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenbuzz.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (83%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenbuzz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.screenbuzz.co.uk

www.screenbuzz.co.uk

2018 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

413 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

251 ms

styles.css

styles.css

170 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

170 ms

wpex-contact-form-7.css

wpex-contact-form-7.css

171 ms

css2

css2

19 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

style.css

style.css

343 ms

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-min.css

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-min.css

254 ms

wpex-wpbakery.css

wpex-wpbakery.css

255 ms

ticons.min.css

ticons.min.css

256 ms

vcex-shortcodes.css

vcex-shortcodes.css

333 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

339 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

339 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

453 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

452 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

535 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

771 ms

weblizar-fronend-twitter-tweets.js

weblizar-fronend-twitter-tweets.js

474 ms

js

js

52 ms

css

css

33 ms

hover-css.min.css

hover-css.min.css

459 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

459 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

461 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

462 ms

index.js

index.js

556 ms

sidr.min.js

sidr.min.js

550 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

551 ms

wpex-superfish.min.js

wpex-superfish.min.js

551 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

552 ms

total.min.js

total.min.js

605 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

index.js

index.js

654 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

656 ms

migrate.min.js

migrate.min.js

655 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

656 ms

js

js

24 ms

js

js

20 ms

js

js

34 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

62 ms

Screenbuzz-Logo-400x101.jpg

Screenbuzz-Logo-400x101.jpg

282 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

282 ms

rocks.jpg

rocks.jpg

776 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

88 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

91 ms

ticons.woff

ticons.woff

600 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

44 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50Xew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50Xew8.ttf

43 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

41 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

41 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30wWw.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30wWw.ttf

44 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

50 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkaVc.ttf

46 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf

43 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

49 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

45 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf

48 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

106 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

364 ms

anchor

anchor

49 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

10 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

13 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

165 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

134 ms

settings

settings

117 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

30 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

17 ms

horizon_timeline.a7991bb824d62c8d5038ddd875db8389.js

horizon_timeline.a7991bb824d62c8d5038ddd875db8389.js

24 ms

embeds

embeds

28 ms

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-max.css

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-max.css

89 ms

Screenbuzz

Screenbuzz

895 ms

polyfills-57d3feabe8bfd4ee389c.js

polyfills-57d3feabe8bfd4ee389c.js

24 ms

runtime-eb61dff4a84b8f906e6b.js

runtime-eb61dff4a84b8f906e6b.js

50 ms

modules.c7def0268c66f6a548ed.js

modules.c7def0268c66f6a548ed.js

76 ms

main-e9db78f5e7b3d83edd5e.js

main-e9db78f5e7b3d83edd5e.js

82 ms

_app-446fb4a338b215deec8c.js

_app-446fb4a338b215deec8c.js

93 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-c8b4c96951cf24f547b4.js

%5BscreenName%5D-c8b4c96951cf24f547b4.js

95 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

99 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

99 ms

Accessibility Review

screenbuzz.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

screenbuzz.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

screenbuzz.co.uk SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenbuzz.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenbuzz.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenbuzz.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenbuzz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: