3.3 sec in total
81 ms
2.3 sec
918 ms
Click here to check amazing Screen Iseasy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screeniseasy.com
SNAPP® screen ... A simple, efficient & cost effective DIY / PRO screen porch screen solution for screening your porch, patio or deck.
Visit screeniseasy.comWe analyzed Screeniseasy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
screeniseasy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.4 s
2/100
10%
Value16,530 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.764
5/100
15%
Value37.4 s
0/100
10%
81 ms
400 ms
260 ms
251 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Screeniseasy.com, 73% (62 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 18% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (709 ms) relates to the external source Secureservercdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 720.1 kB (11%)
6.8 MB
6.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Screeniseasy.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 579.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screen Iseasy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screeniseasy.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (57%)
67
29
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Iseasy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screeniseasy.com
81 ms
screenporch.com
400 ms
analytics.js
260 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
251 ms
style.min.css
278 ms
front-flex.min.css
332 ms
lightbox.min.css
333 ms
sow-image-default-d6014b76747a.css
338 ms
sow-image-default-17bc2272b535.css
331 ms
sow-image-default-2ec334f0a340.css
347 ms
sow-image-default-a5258576d588.css
331 ms
sow-image-default-6b88c04c1f9b.css
347 ms
defaults.css
346 ms
frontend.min.css
331 ms
css
223 ms
animate.css
325 ms
font-awesome.css
360 ms
style.css
407 ms
default.min.css
437 ms
frontend.min.js
379 ms
jquery.min.js
482 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
389 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
376 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
688 ms
owl.carousel.css
687 ms
widgets.css
688 ms
lsow-frontend.min.js
692 ms
lightbox.min.js
690 ms
lightbox-options.min.js
688 ms
so-premium-tmce-fonts-importer.min.js
673 ms
modernizr.js
671 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
670 ms
owl.carousel.js
705 ms
jquery.superfish.js
706 ms
exoplanet-custom.js
705 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
707 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
705 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
706 ms
vimeo.min.js
708 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
709 ms
linkid.js
78 ms
collect
67 ms
collect
179 ms
cropped-screenporchero2.jpg
432 ms
screenporchero1.jpg
434 ms
snappscreen_001a.jpg
457 ms
snappscreen_002a.jpg
461 ms
snappscreen_003a.jpg
431 ms
snappscreen_004a.jpg
480 ms
SCREEN_PORCH_A2.jpg
447 ms
snappscreen_007a.jpg
498 ms
snappscreensystem002-1.jpg
484 ms
snapp_screen_system_extrusion_01a.jpg
498 ms
snappscreen_008a.jpg
486 ms
snappscreen_009a.jpg
499 ms
snappscreen_010a.jpg
496 ms
snappscreen_011.jpg
507 ms
houzz_snapp_extreme1a.jpg
496 ms
houzz_snapp_extreme2a.png
503 ms
FORM15002PAGE1.jpg
511 ms
FORM15002PAGE2.jpg
523 ms
SNAPPSCREENSAMPLEPACK.jpg
504 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdr.ttf
439 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7g.ttf
560 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdr.ttf
547 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdr.ttf
557 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
320 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
556 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
592 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERKSiA.ttf
580 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4AQ.ttf
580 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERKSiA.ttf
578 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERKSiA.ttf
580 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERKSiA.ttf
575 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjvmyI.ttf
615 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf
616 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvmyI.ttf
615 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf
626 ms
prev.png
114 ms
next.png
69 ms
loading.gif
68 ms
close.png
72 ms
bx_loader.gif
70 ms
player_api
143 ms
mejs-controls.svg
53 ms
screeniseasy.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
screeniseasy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
screeniseasy.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screeniseasy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screeniseasy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screeniseasy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screen Iseasy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: