Tools & Wizards About Us
screenmedics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

screenmedics.com

Window & Porch Screen Experts in Raleigh, NC | Screen Medics

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

573 ms

screenmedics.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screen Medics content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenmedics.com

We are a local, Veteran-owned company offering a wide range of screen, porch, and deck services/products for our customers in the Raleigh, North Carolina area.

Visit screenmedics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenmedics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenmedics.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenmedics.com

59 ms

screenmedics.com

1132 ms

autoptimize_4567e64e51459e903bf63ed89608fb02.css

32 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

28 ms

js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Screenmedics.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Screenmedics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenmedics.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 104.5 kB

  • Original 125.9 kB
  • After minification 119.9 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 53.3 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screen Medics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 115 B

  • Original 158.0 kB
  • After minification 158.0 kB
  • After compression 157.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 54 B

  • Original 98.9 kB
  • After minification 98.9 kB
  • After compression 98.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenmedics.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (24%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Medics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenmedics.com

screenmedics.com

59 ms

screenmedics.com

screenmedics.com

1132 ms

autoptimize_4567e64e51459e903bf63ed89608fb02.css

autoptimize_4567e64e51459e903bf63ed89608fb02.css

32 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

28 ms

js

js

75 ms

js

js

296 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

63 ms

pum-site-styles.css

pum-site-styles.css

60 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

61 ms

et-core-unified-17312825208976.min.css

et-core-unified-17312825208976.min.css

63 ms

autoptimize_59147a0262e9f33d3f27b0df610da0aa.js

autoptimize_59147a0262e9f33d3f27b0df610da0aa.js

59 ms

css

css

43 ms

Facebook.png

Facebook.png

184 ms

embed

embed

442 ms

twitter-x-square-32-1-1.png

twitter-x-square-32-1-1.png

45 ms

google-my-business.png

google-my-business.png

47 ms

Instagram.png

Instagram.png

44 ms

Screen-Medics-Logo-UPDATE-March-2017-3-New-Logo-Transparent-res.png

Screen-Medics-Logo-UPDATE-March-2017-3-New-Logo-Transparent-res.png

46 ms

iStock-1329389932_slider.jpg

iStock-1329389932_slider.jpg

48 ms

886941104ba6a2be94ae6cd6de8a7283-res.jpg

886941104ba6a2be94ae6cd6de8a7283-res.jpg

55 ms

9bf5899eecd1da676ddaf62722efa0d5_cover.jpg

9bf5899eecd1da676ddaf62722efa0d5_cover.jpg

56 ms

01df17fa4e23ce06540113c1dea79c4c.jpg

01df17fa4e23ce06540113c1dea79c4c.jpg

57 ms

69dbd048e93edf30128ecb380d5a9145.jpg

69dbd048e93edf30128ecb380d5a9145.jpg

58 ms

973c36447a16c75ab9dca97f84b07aeb.jpg

973c36447a16c75ab9dca97f84b07aeb.jpg

60 ms

iStock-183323433_home.jpg

iStock-183323433_home.jpg

59 ms

12a2bcd682cfb2386c57617cee3cd403-1.jpg

12a2bcd682cfb2386c57617cee3cd403-1.jpg

57 ms

3e4a43d3ec400f864d9b4a3697c83aff.jpg

3e4a43d3ec400f864d9b4a3697c83aff.jpg

68 ms

0be46b509766a35b834e6e31ac23da8e.jpg

0be46b509766a35b834e6e31ac23da8e.jpg

66 ms

boha-2017-150x139.jpg

boha-2017-150x139.jpg

65 ms

home_advisor_3_year_badge-142x150.jpg

home_advisor_3_year_badge-142x150.jpg

77 ms

elite-150x150.jpg

elite-150x150.jpg

76 ms

50reviews-1-131x150.png

50reviews-1-131x150.png

72 ms

logo.png

logo.png

77 ms

ck_mobile.png

ck_mobile.png

103 ms

mp_mobile.png

mp_mobile.png

79 ms

arrow_down.png

arrow_down.png

83 ms

ebay-logo.png

ebay-logo.png

87 ms

WordJack-Media_Final_icon-orange.png

WordJack-Media_Final_icon-orange.png

88 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

77 ms

js

js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

screenmedics.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

screenmedics.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

screenmedics.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenmedics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenmedics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenmedics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screen Medics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: