Tools & Wizards About Us
screenmeter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

screenmeter.com

TeamLogger | Employee Monitoring & Time Tracking with Screenshots

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

240 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

531 ms

screenmeter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screenmeter content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenmeter.com

Employee Monitoring & Time Tracking with Screenshots. $1 / User / Month

Visit screenmeter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenmeter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenmeter.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenmeter.com

240 ms

www.screenmeter.com

373 ms

www.teamlogger.com

80 ms

js

97 ms

css

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Screenmeter.com, 25% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 13% (7 requests) were made to D1zwnxfrmfsj5m.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (373 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenmeter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

890.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenmeter.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 638.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 67.8 kB

  • Original 75.2 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.2 kB, which is 57% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 60.6 kB

  • Original 638.1 kB
  • After minification 577.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenmeter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 305.2 kB
  • After minification 305.2 kB
  • After compression 269.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenmeter.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (76%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenmeter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenmeter.com

screenmeter.com

240 ms

www.screenmeter.com

www.screenmeter.com

373 ms

www.teamlogger.com

www.teamlogger.com

80 ms

js

js

97 ms

css

css

104 ms

css

css

121 ms

css

css

124 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

96 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

94 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

76 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

80 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

77 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

78 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

82 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

81 ms

modernizr-custom.js

modernizr-custom.js

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

69 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

99 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

116 ms

mobile.min.js

mobile.min.js

89 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

76 ms

js

js

115 ms

screen2.jpg

screen2.jpg

175 ms

profile-1.jpg

profile-1.jpg

171 ms

counters-001.jpg

counters-001.jpg

42 ms

profile-2.jpg

profile-2.jpg

224 ms

profile-3.png

profile-3.png

298 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

69 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

70 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

216 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

234 ms

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGA.ttf

233 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

233 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

264 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

230 ms

1etcir91k

1etcir91k

221 ms

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

40 ms

smoothscroll.min.js

smoothscroll.min.js

185 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

79 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

160 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

66 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

61 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

65 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

80 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

175 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

71 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

75 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

96 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

83 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

95 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

158 ms

Accessibility Review

screenmeter.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

screenmeter.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

screenmeter.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenmeter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenmeter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenmeter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenmeter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: