Tools & Wizards About Us
screenpresso.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

screenpresso.com

Screenpresso: The Ultimate Screen Capture Tool for Windows

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

screenpresso.com screenshot

About Website

Visit screenpresso.com now to see the best up-to-date Screenpresso content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about screenpresso.com

Grab an image or video of what you see on your computer screen (screen capture), annotate, and share with anyone.

Visit screenpresso.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenpresso.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenpresso.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenpresso.com

183 ms

www.screenpresso.com

441 ms

widgets.js

243 ms

js

164 ms

webpack-runtime-355f820bccfae9b4246e.js

223 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Screenpresso.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenpresso.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (82%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

342.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenpresso.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 231.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 109.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 321 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenpresso.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 321 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenpresso. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenpresso.com

screenpresso.com

183 ms

www.screenpresso.com

www.screenpresso.com

441 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

243 ms

js

js

164 ms

webpack-runtime-355f820bccfae9b4246e.js

webpack-runtime-355f820bccfae9b4246e.js

223 ms

framework-8b6c89f679f7c9ad7adc.js

framework-8b6c89f679f7c9ad7adc.js

251 ms

app-ba27500ca60b5e7697f7.js

app-ba27500ca60b5e7697f7.js

387 ms

tarteaucitron.js

tarteaucitron.js

295 ms

css

css

164 ms

Lato-Regular-2fee7146711cc5c3dd418186871adf9d.woff

Lato-Regular-2fee7146711cc5c3dd418186871adf9d.woff

560 ms

LatoLatin-Regular-4a38ade2ce0988376595ae1c5751b1d4.woff

LatoLatin-Regular-4a38ade2ce0988376595ae1c5751b1d4.woff

361 ms

Lato-Bold-497f04acb55a3d00dfa33149841d28ed.woff

Lato-Bold-497f04acb55a3d00dfa33149841d28ed.woff

362 ms

LatoLatin-Bold-8525916133d63443ee214d60b7e2fee4.woff

LatoLatin-Bold-8525916133d63443ee214d60b7e2fee4.woff

361 ms

ARcAAA==

ARcAAA==

19 ms

icons-eeccf4f66002c6f2ba24d3d22f2434c2.woff

icons-eeccf4f66002c6f2ba24d3d22f2434c2.woff

460 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

73 ms

fa-brands-400-150de8eaa454d669c405d810c8dbbf14.ttf

fa-brands-400-150de8eaa454d669c405d810c8dbbf14.ttf

343 ms

fa-solid-900-4a2cd718d7031b732e7610fba99ecf74.ttf

fa-solid-900-4a2cd718d7031b732e7610fba99ecf74.ttf

342 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

62 ms

settings

settings

182 ms

wEO_EBrAnc9BLjLQAUk1VvoP.ttf

wEO_EBrAnc9BLjLQAUk1VvoP.ttf

62 ms

tarteaucitron.css

tarteaucitron.css

98 ms

tarteaucitron.en.js

tarteaucitron.en.js

95 ms

tarteaucitron.services.js

tarteaucitron.services.js

137 ms

Accessibility Review

screenpresso.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

screenpresso.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

screenpresso.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenpresso.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screenpresso.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenpresso.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenpresso. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: