24.9 sec in total
3 sec
12.5 sec
9.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Screensaver Life content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screensaverlife.com
Free Download Most Popular Tools & Apps On Multimedia, Games, Utilities, Communication and Business Related Catalog from ScreenSaverLife.com.
Visit screensaverlife.comWe analyzed Screensaverlife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 21.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
screensaverlife.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value4.6 s
36/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
2989 ms
1981 ms
981 ms
868 ms
853 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Screensaverlife.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Dsms0mj1bbhn4.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.ravenjs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 814.7 kB (73%)
1.1 MB
297.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Screensaverlife.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screensaver Life needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 729.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 729.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screensaverlife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (81%)
27
5
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screensaver Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.screensaverlife.com
2989 ms
shareaholic.js
1981 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
981 ms
default-style.css
868 ms
style.css
853 ms
style.css
829 ms
css
606 ms
jquery.js
653 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
606 ms
superfish.js
572 ms
jquery.easing_1.3.js
572 ms
lofslider.js
1259 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1.min.js
1143 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
1456 ms
custom.js
597 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2285 ms
masonry.min.js
2250 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2250 ms
sep-bg.png
485 ms
prev.png
471 ms
next.png
548 ms
magnify.png
436 ms
arrow-sidebar.png
435 ms
footer-bg.png
516 ms
counter.js
497 ms
4f10688b86572d2645fc12feabd31cec.json
472 ms
raven.min.js
3744 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
3118 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
3118 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
3118 ms
t.php
3250 ms
screensaverlife.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
screensaverlife.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
screensaverlife.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screensaverlife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Screensaverlife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screensaverlife.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screensaver Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: