Tools & Wizards About Us
screenshot.how screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

screenshot.how

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

601 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

153 ms

screenshot.how screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Screenshot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenshot.how

Screenshot How is Easy, full-featured application used for screen shot capturing, screen shot sharing, text sharing, text editor tool, allowing temporary storage effortlessly.

Visit screenshot.how

Key Findings

We analyzed Screenshot.how page load time and found that the first response time was 601 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

screenshot.how performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

screenshot.how

601 ms

bootstrap.min.css

145 ms

jcrop.css

141 ms

cropper.css

135 ms

style.css

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Screenshot.how, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenshot.how.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 231.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

507.9 kB

After Optimization

276.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Screenshot.how main page is 507.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 285.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 56.9 kB
  • After minification 46.2 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 87.2 kB

  • Original 111.8 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Screenshot needs image optimization as it can save up to 87.2 kB or 78% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 79.3 kB

  • Original 285.2 kB
  • After minification 285.2 kB
  • After compression 205.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenshot.how needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenshot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

screenshot.how

screenshot.how

601 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

145 ms

jcrop.css

jcrop.css

141 ms

cropper.css

cropper.css

135 ms

style.css

style.css

137 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

140 ms

css

css

40 ms

css

css

52 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

39 ms

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

302 ms

bootstrap-3.3.7.min.js

bootstrap-3.3.7.min.js

299 ms

jqueryeasing-1.3.min.js

jqueryeasing-1.3.min.js

300 ms

cropper.js

cropper.js

322 ms

ace.js

ace.js

491 ms

ext-modelist.js

ext-modelist.js

288 ms

script-1.3.js

script-1.3.js

324 ms

keyboard.png

keyboard.png

316 ms

css

css

27 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

188 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

141 ms

google.png

google.png

148 ms

reddit.png

reddit.png

272 ms

slider-back.png

slider-back.png

270 ms

slider-button.png

slider-button.png

271 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

141 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

73 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

42 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

50 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

54 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

159 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

157 ms

ads

ads

135 ms

ga.js

ga.js

45 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

screenshot.how accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

screenshot.how best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

screenshot.how SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenshot.how can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Screenshot.how main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

screenshot.how

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screenshot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: