1.9 sec in total
293 ms
1.5 sec
101 ms
Click here to check amazing Screenweaver content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about screenweaver.org
Visit screenweaver.orgWe analyzed Screenweaver.org page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
screenweaver.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
293 ms
334 ms
410 ms
9 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Screenweaver.org, 16% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 16% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (410 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenweaver.org.
Page size can be reduced by 120.9 kB (53%)
227.9 kB
107.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenweaver.org main page is 227.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 181.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 443 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screenweaver images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (30%)
23
16
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screenweaver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
doku.php
293 ms
css.php
334 ms
js.php
410 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
urchin.js
5 ms
body_background.jpg
38 ms
header_background.jpg
38 ms
banner.jpg
70 ms
menu_background.png
45 ms
bullet.gif
38 ms
ca-pub-1213918724147845.js
121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
39 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
button_bg.jpg
39 ms
__utm.gif
9 ms
css.php
254 ms
ads
232 ms
osd.js
7 ms
m_js_controller.js
22 ms
abg.js
34 ms
favicon
56 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
39 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
27 ms
s
27 ms
x_button_blue2.png
15 ms
screenweaver.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
screenweaver.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
screenweaver.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenweaver.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Screenweaver.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
screenweaver.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Screenweaver. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: