Tools & Wizards About Us
scriptcopy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

scriptcopy.com

Website Copying | Website Cloning Services | SiteCopying.com

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

964 ms

Page Rendered

110 ms

scriptcopy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to scriptcopy.com homepage info - get ready to check Scriptcopy best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about scriptcopy.com

SiteCopying's website copying and website cloning services helps you to create your own online business by replicating websites which are already established online.

Visit scriptcopy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scriptcopy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scriptcopy.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,140 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.475

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scriptcopy.com

142 ms

www.sitecopying.com

216 ms

js

81 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.css

31 ms

fw.min.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scriptcopy.com, 53% (39 requests) were made to Sitecopying.com and 25% (18 requests) were made to Dt4rc05ukkfue.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) relates to the external source Sitecopying.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

511.4 kB

After Optimization

470.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scriptcopy.com main page is 511.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 28.4 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 26.0 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 99.2 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scriptcopy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 289.1 kB
  • After minification 289.1 kB
  • After compression 280.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 202 B

  • Original 89.7 kB
  • After minification 89.7 kB
  • After compression 89.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scriptcopy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (65%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scriptcopy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

scriptcopy.com

scriptcopy.com

142 ms

www.sitecopying.com

www.sitecopying.com

216 ms

js

js

81 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.css

31 ms

fw.min.css

fw.min.css

55 ms

app.min.css

app.min.css

78 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

120 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

122 ms

settings.min.css

settings.min.css

123 ms

extralayers.css

extralayers.css

127 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

129 ms

bootstrap_new.min.css

bootstrap_new.min.css

181 ms

bootstrap.min_new.css

bootstrap.min_new.css

191 ms

blue.min.css

blue.min.css

128 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

205 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

179 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

188 ms

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

jquery-1.8.0.min.js

220 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.min.js

233 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

202 ms

fw.min.js

fw.min.js

202 ms

jquery.metadata.min.js

jquery.metadata.min.js

227 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

228 ms

style.css

style.css

229 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

231 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

231 ms

css

css

45 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

258 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

252 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

297 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

258 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

258 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

312 ms

jquery.countTo.min.js

jquery.countTo.min.js

312 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.min.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.min.js

312 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

313 ms

template.min.js

template.min.js

311 ms

2725694.js

2725694.js

65 ms

css

css

21 ms

slider-1-slide-2.webp

slider-1-slide-2.webp

142 ms

slider-new-1.webp

slider-new-1.webp

206 ms

slider-1-slide-3.webp

slider-1-slide-3.webp

294 ms

slider-new-2.webp

slider-new-2.webp

242 ms

slider-1-slide-1.webp

slider-1-slide-1.webp

245 ms

slider-new-3.webp

slider-new-3.webp

255 ms

home-image.webp

home-image.webp

257 ms

footer-logo.webp

footer-logo.webp

292 ms

nsp7fo3o4pa.png

nsp7fo3o4pa.png

140 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

105 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

148 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

158 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

136 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

61 ms

banner.js

banner.js

160 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

185 ms

fb.js

fb.js

115 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

122 ms

2725694.js

2725694.js

167 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

109 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

70 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

93 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

93 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

57 ms

slider-1-slide-2.jpg

slider-1-slide-2.jpg

153 ms

slider-new-1.jpg

slider-new-1.jpg

99 ms

slider-1-slide-2.webp

slider-1-slide-2.webp

62 ms

slider-new-2.png

slider-new-2.png

71 ms

slider-1-slide-1.jpg

slider-1-slide-1.jpg

58 ms

slider-new-3.png

slider-new-3.png

96 ms

home-image.png

home-image.png

44 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

54 ms

slider-1-slide-3.jpg

slider-1-slide-3.jpg

34 ms

slider-1-slide-2.webp

slider-1-slide-2.webp

2 ms

Accessibility Review

scriptcopy.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

scriptcopy.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

scriptcopy.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scriptcopy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scriptcopy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

scriptcopy.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Scriptcopy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: