3.8 sec in total
190 ms
3 sec
621 ms
Click here to check amazing Scuff Doc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about scuffdoc.com
Covering the whole of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire we offer mobile wheel refurbishment and mobile bodywork repair services. Get in contact with us today!
Visit scuffdoc.comWe analyzed Scuffdoc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
scuffdoc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.5 s
1/100
10%
Value3,170 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
190 ms
932 ms
90 ms
151 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Scuffdoc.com, 78% (84 requests) were made to Scuffdoc.co.uk and 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) relates to the external source Scuffdoc.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 316.4 kB (16%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Scuffdoc.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 956.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scuff Doc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scuffdoc.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (63%)
95
35
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scuff Doc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
scuffdoc.com
190 ms
scuffdoc.co.uk
932 ms
gtm.js
90 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
151 ms
style.min.css
267 ms
classic-themes.min.css
277 ms
dnd-upload-cf7.css
275 ms
styles.css
270 ms
front.min.css
274 ms
settings.css
270 ms
widget-options.css
321 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
342 ms
style.css
341 ms
base.css
363 ms
layout.css
433 ms
shortcodes.css
443 ms
animations.min.css
407 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
423 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
425 ms
responsive.css
453 ms
css
33 ms
js_composer.min.css
588 ms
css
50 ms
pum-site.min.css
504 ms
css
67 ms
jquery.min.js
551 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
447 ms
front.min.js
448 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
564 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
564 ms
js
46 ms
css
21 ms
scripts.js
547 ms
codedropz-uploader-min.js
546 ms
dnd-upload-cf7.js
620 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend-script.js
622 ms
api.js
67 ms
core.min.js
622 ms
mouse.min.js
623 ms
sortable.min.js
628 ms
tabs.min.js
663 ms
accordion.min.js
746 ms
plugins.js
883 ms
menu.js
747 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
animations.min.js
731 ms
collect
15 ms
jplayer.min.js
675 ms
js
35 ms
translate3d.js
557 ms
scripts.js
579 ms
comment-reply.min.js
583 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
598 ms
site.min.js
684 ms
scuff-doc-logo-1.png
365 ms
scuff-doc-logo-mobile.png
365 ms
transparent.png
364 ms
slider-2.jpg
509 ms
home_tuning_sep3.png
455 ms
slider2.jpg
548 ms
slider-3-latest.jpg
609 ms
home_tuning_sep3.png
421 ms
home_tuning_sep1.png
421 ms
small-sd.png
511 ms
mobile-1.jpg
592 ms
home_tuning_mechanic.jpg
631 ms
bodywork-1-square.jpg
565 ms
home-pic3.jpg
690 ms
home-pic2.jpg
608 ms
home-pic1.jpg
767 ms
clients-img.jpg
671 ms
facebook.jpg
676 ms
yellow.jpg
692 ms
google-ic.jpg
713 ms
contact-us-image.jpg
914 ms
home_tuning_sep2.png
766 ms
whatsapp-true-color.jpg
786 ms
owa.tracker-combined-min.js
659 ms
calltracking.min.js
731 ms
home_tuning_sep4.png
783 ms
pop-up.jpg
790 ms
home_tuning_sectionbg_3.png
692 ms
b-letter.png
718 ms
home_tuning_countersep.png
734 ms
home_tuning_sectionbg_1.png
732 ms
recaptcha__en.js
60 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
27 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
35 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
188 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
191 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
192 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
189 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
191 ms
mfn-icons.woff
836 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
191 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
593 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
619 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
634 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
636 ms
refill
822 ms
refill
801 ms
box_shadow.png
654 ms
bodywork-1-square.jpg
502 ms
home-pic2.jpg
469 ms
home-pic3.jpg
393 ms
home-pic1.jpg
403 ms
scuffdoc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
scuffdoc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
scuffdoc.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scuffdoc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scuffdoc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
scuffdoc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scuff Doc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: