9.9 sec in total
202 ms
9.3 sec
390 ms
Visit seafar.org now to see the best up-to-date Seafar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seafar.org
紫微斗数免费算命,紫微命盘分析教学、紫微排盘软件的知识社群。算命的方法与概念与经验分享的网站。Cmsong紫微斗数排盘分析软件【繁简体】.欢迎大家光临
Visit seafar.orgWe analyzed Seafar.org page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
seafar.org performance score
202 ms
784 ms
238 ms
203 ms
250 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Seafar.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Paipan.seafar.org and 1% (1 request) were made to S4.cnzz.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Pcookie.cnzz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 507.1 kB (63%)
806.9 kB
299.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Seafar.org main page is 806.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 297.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Seafar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 214.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seafar.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (23%)
56
43
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seafar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
seafar.org
202 ms
www.seafar.org
784 ms
bootstrap.css
238 ms
icon.css
203 ms
common.css
250 ms
link.css
194 ms
style.css
189 ms
seafar.css
257 ms
jquery.2.js
329 ms
jquery.form.js
273 ms
plug-in_module.js
349 ms
aws.js
316 ms
aw_template.js
325 ms
app.js
320 ms
compatibility.js
366 ms
21.jpg
210 ms
sun.png
296 ms
moon.png
226 ms
bg.gif
162 ms
logo.png
164 ms
logo.png
165 ms
avatar-max-img.png
168 ms
17.jpg
162 ms
topic-mid-img.png
163 ms
logo-slo.png
177 ms
23.jpg
166 ms
24.jpg
174 ms
25.jpg
165 ms
17.jpg
171 ms
8.jpg
172 ms
3.jpg
167 ms
16.jpg
207 ms
1.jpg
198 ms
63_avatar_max.jpg
223 ms
91_avatar_max.jpg
278 ms
73_avatar_max.jpg
249 ms
64_avatar_max.jpg
276 ms
06_avatar_mid.jpg
299 ms
77_avatar_mid.jpg
297 ms
77_avatar_max.jpg
299 ms
87_avatar_max.jpg
390 ms
64_avatar_mid.jpg
393 ms
89_avatar_mid.jpg
391 ms
691a198de39a0a8bd44a9c5195d3d8fe.gif
424 ms
70_avatar_max.jpg
405 ms
17_avatar_mid.jpg
395 ms
27_avatar_mid.jpg
427 ms
63_avatar_mid.jpg
476 ms
74_avatar_mid.jpg
434 ms
03_avatar_mid.jpg
441 ms
26_avatar_mid.jpg
481 ms
00_avatar_mid.jpg
483 ms
21.jpg
104 ms
25.jpg
118 ms
23.jpg
87 ms
3.jpg
103 ms
icomoon.woff
114 ms
17.jpg
84 ms
8.jpg
225 ms
24.jpg
225 ms
stat.php
1158 ms
1.jpg
197 ms
16.jpg
187 ms
63_avatar_max.jpg
176 ms
73_avatar_max.jpg
150 ms
64_avatar_max.jpg
169 ms
91_avatar_max.jpg
178 ms
77_avatar_mid.jpg
196 ms
06_avatar_mid.jpg
190 ms
77_avatar_max.jpg
153 ms
87_avatar_max.jpg
74 ms
89_avatar_mid.jpg
133 ms
64_avatar_mid.jpg
158 ms
17_avatar_mid.jpg
133 ms
70_avatar_max.jpg
143 ms
691a198de39a0a8bd44a9c5195d3d8fe.gif
137 ms
27_avatar_mid.jpg
149 ms
74_avatar_mid.jpg
165 ms
03_avatar_mid.jpg
164 ms
63_avatar_mid.jpg
144 ms
26_avatar_mid.jpg
143 ms
00_avatar_mid.jpg
138 ms
stat.htm
246 ms
core.php
1697 ms
9.gif
879 ms
pic.gif
777 ms
wechat_code.jpg
202 ms
app.gif
4069 ms
seafar.org SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seafar.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Seafar.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
seafar.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Seafar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: