Tools & Wizards About Us
searchmarkup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

searchmarkup.com

Digital Marketing Agency for SEO Services, PPC Marketing, & Social Media

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

searchmarkup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Searchmarkup content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about searchmarkup.com

The best digital marketing agency in India for digital marketing services, get top 3 Google digital marketing results, featured ranking using digital marketing company SEO services, Local SEO, PPC Mar...

Visit searchmarkup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Searchmarkup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

searchmarkup.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

searchmarkup.com

32 ms

searchmarkup.com

1584 ms

css

33 ms

tcb-base-css-26522-1719907113.css

23 ms

placeholders.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Searchmarkup.com, 41% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 19% (6 requests) were made to Staging.searchmarkup.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Searchmarkup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 628.6 kB (86%)

Content Size

735.0 kB

After Optimization

106.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Searchmarkup.com main page is 735.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 732.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 628.6 kB

  • Original 732.4 kB
  • After minification 730.6 kB
  • After compression 103.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 628.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Searchmarkup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Searchmarkup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

searchmarkup.com

searchmarkup.com

32 ms

searchmarkup.com

searchmarkup.com

1584 ms

css

css

33 ms

tcb-base-css-26522-1719907113.css

tcb-base-css-26522-1719907113.css

23 ms

placeholders.css

placeholders.css

23 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

31 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

23 ms

design.css

design.css

28 ms

select2.css

select2.css

32 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

42 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e0.ttf

322 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

459 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e0.ttf

546 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf

550 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf

550 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf

549 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf

549 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

545 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

552 ms

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbM-4J_HWSQ.ttf

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbM-4J_HWSQ.ttf

550 ms

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbPa4J_HWSQ.ttf

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbPa4J_HWSQ.ttf

552 ms

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbBG_J_HWSQ.ttf

or3PQ6P12-iJxAIgLa78DkrbXsDgk0oVDaDPYLanFLHpPf2TbBG_J_HWSQ.ttf

552 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

288 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

225 ms

search-markeup-new-logo.png

search-markeup-new-logo.png

13 ms

Starter-SEO-Packages.jpg

Starter-SEO-Packages.jpg

41 ms

Standard-SEO-Packages.jpg

Standard-SEO-Packages.jpg

37 ms

Professional-SEO-Packages-1.png

Professional-SEO-Packages-1.png

36 ms

Local-SEO-Starter-.jpg

Local-SEO-Starter-.jpg

36 ms

Standard-local-Seo-package-.jpg

Standard-local-Seo-package-.jpg

36 ms

Professional-local-Seo-package-.jpg

Professional-local-Seo-package-.jpg

36 ms

main.js

main.js

8 ms

Accessibility Review

searchmarkup.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

searchmarkup.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

searchmarkup.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Searchmarkup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Searchmarkup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

searchmarkup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Searchmarkup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: