3.4 sec in total
95 ms
1.9 sec
1.3 sec
Visit secureentry.com now to see the best up-to-date Secure Entry content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about secureentry.com
Visit secureentry.comWe analyzed Secureentry.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
secureentry.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value14,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.186
66/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
95 ms
75 ms
181 ms
192 ms
245 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Secureentry.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Static.hsappstatic.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) belongs to the original domain Secureentry.com.
Page size can be reduced by 65.1 kB (15%)
441.9 kB
376.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Secureentry.com main page is 441.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 281.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Secure Entry needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 495 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Secureentry.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (75%)
63
16
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Entry. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
schools
95 ms
front-animate-min.css
75 ms
front-slick-min.css
181 ms
front-style-min.css
192 ms
front-responsive-min.css
245 ms
js
119 ms
js
183 ms
MeetingsEmbedCode.js
106 ms
jquery.js
319 ms
jquery_cookie.js
314 ms
wow.js
316 ms
slick.js
314 ms
273145b0e2.js
116 ms
api.js
105 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
314 ms
front-end-validation.js
315 ms
hide_form.js
395 ms
script.js
398 ms
bootstrap.min.css
90 ms
bootstrap.min.js
97 ms
9136286.js
173 ms
9136286.js
173 ms
conversion_async.js
174 ms
js
42 ms
fbevents.js
125 ms
logo_home.svg
123 ms
logo.svg
119 ms
schools.jpg
277 ms
challenges_ico.svg
248 ms
challenges_ico_hover.svg
249 ms
solutions_ico.svg
244 ms
solutions_ico_hover.svg
241 ms
ae-product.png
415 ms
footer_logo.png
282 ms
Facebook.svg
281 ms
Instagram.svg
271 ms
Youtube.svg
272 ms
Linkedin.svg
399 ms
6123d95ff066350014e61431
220 ms
test_badge.png
398 ms
footer_wave.svg
376 ms
analytics.js
134 ms
brandon_bld-webfont.woff
313 ms
brandon_med-webfont.woff
316 ms
brandon_reg-webfont.woff
388 ms
brandon_blk-webfont.woff
388 ms
sales-team
151 ms
insight.min.js
99 ms
192439796097315
128 ms
recaptcha__en.js
211 ms
178 ms
76 ms
9136286.js
197 ms
9136286.js
197 ms
fb.js
177 ms
collect
40 ms
core.js
39 ms
bundle.production.js
79 ms
book-info-early-requester.js
69 ms
project_with_deps.css
68 ms
configure-monitoring.js
69 ms
bundle.production.js
140 ms
project.js
147 ms
collect
194 ms
85 ms
103 ms
ga-audiences
20 ms
15 ms
secureentry.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
secureentry.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
secureentry.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Secureentry.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Secureentry.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
secureentry.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Secure Entry. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: