2.3 sec in total
372 ms
1.7 sec
230 ms
Welcome to secureprotection.co homepage info - get ready to check Secure Protection best content right away, or after learning these important things about secureprotection.co
Secure Protection Services
Visit secureprotection.coWe analyzed Secureprotection.co page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
secureprotection.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.346
32/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
372 ms
37 ms
62 ms
64 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Secureprotection.co, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (538 ms) relates to the external source Sitedudesstats.com.
Page size can be reduced by 422.5 kB (28%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Secureprotection.co main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 978.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Secure Protection images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 201.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Secureprotection.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (71%)
35
10
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure Protection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.secureprotection.co
372 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
style.css
62 ms
style.min.css
64 ms
classic-themes.min.css
34 ms
styles.css
33 ms
sow-social-media-buttons-atom-ec9dbac86041.css
38 ms
css
23 ms
default.css
47 ms
style.css
52 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
53 ms
responsive-menu.js
65 ms
js
72 ms
lytebox.css
61 ms
lytebox.js
65 ms
sow-social-media-buttons-atom-9daad916ca3b.css
43 ms
style.css
44 ms
front-legacy.css
56 ms
index.js
52 ms
index.js
52 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
99 ms
api.js
99 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
60 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
98 ms
index.js
66 ms
css
31 ms
bg.jpg
73 ms
new-logo.png
20 ms
navbg.jpg
17 ms
slide1.jpg
56 ms
car1.jpg
47 ms
centre2.jpg
63 ms
lytebox.css
60 ms
lytebox.js
88 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff
13 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff
18 ms
qWcsB6-ypo7xBdr6Xshe96H3aDvbsRsis4I.woff
133 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
32 ms
bg_control_nav.png
14 ms
icon-direction-nav.png
16 ms
piwik.js
538 ms
secureprotection.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
secureprotection.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
secureprotection.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Secureprotection.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Secureprotection.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
secureprotection.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Secure Protection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: