Tools & Wizards About Us
securewamp.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

securewamp.org

SecureWAMP - the secure WAMP with Apache, MariaDB SQL, PHP, FileZilla and Mercury/32

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

securewamp.org screenshot

About Website

Visit securewamp.org now to see the best up-to-date SecureWAMP content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securewamp.org

With SecureWAMP you can set up a complete and safe WAMP-System in a few minitues, which you can administrate completely via a GUI.

Visit securewamp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Securewamp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

securewamp.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

181 ms

style.css

166 ms

nv500_en.jpg

662 ms

online1.GIF

660 ms

online2.GIF

650 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Securewamp.org, 15% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Myvisitorcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) relates to the external source Srware.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.0 kB (22%)

Content Size

91.0 kB

After Optimization

71.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Securewamp.org main page is 91.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 61.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 824 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 14.9 kB

  • Original 61.0 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SecureWAMP needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 20.9 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 448 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securewamp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 448 B or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SecureWAMP. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

181 ms

style.css

style.css

166 ms

nv500_en.jpg

nv500_en.jpg

662 ms

online1.GIF

online1.GIF

660 ms

online2.GIF

online2.GIF

650 ms

icon_96.png

icon_96.png

182 ms

gui_en.jpg

gui_en.jpg

268 ms

1069760NordVPN_300x250_1.gif

1069760NordVPN_300x250_1.gif

358 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

12 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

383 ms

body.jpg

body.jpg

244 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

389 ms

light-bottom.css

light-bottom.css

24 ms

Accessibility Review

securewamp.org accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

securewamp.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

securewamp.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securewamp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Securewamp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

securewamp.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SecureWAMP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: