6.3 sec in total
203 ms
4.7 sec
1.4 sec
Visit securityfoiling.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Securityfoiling content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about securityfoiling.co.uk
Security Foiling Limited is a document security solutions provider. Home of MicroPOISE hologram applicator, Duogram & Datafoil
Visit securityfoiling.co.ukWe analyzed Securityfoiling.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
securityfoiling.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.476
18/100
15%
Value9.3 s
32/100
10%
203 ms
1705 ms
89 ms
179 ms
270 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Securityfoiling.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.gtranslate.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Securityfoiling.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 256.8 kB (11%)
2.4 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Securityfoiling.co.uk main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.6 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 196.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Securityfoiling needs image optimization as it can save up to 196.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 577 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Securityfoiling.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Securityfoiling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
securityfoiling.co.uk
203 ms
www.securityfoiling.co.uk
1705 ms
joomla-alert.min.css
89 ms
fontawesome.min.css
179 ms
hikashop.css
270 ms
frontend_custom.css
277 ms
content.min.css
281 ms
nucleus.css
283 ms
orion_137.css
285 ms
bootstrap5.css
294 ms
joomla-fontawesome.min.css
357 ms
debug.css
368 ms
font-awesome5-pseudo.min.css
369 ms
orion-joomla_137.css
372 ms
custom_137.css
376 ms
swiper.min.css
378 ms
notify-metro.css
445 ms
jquery.min.js
726 ms
jquery-noconflict.min.js
461 ms
core.min.js
463 ms
collapse.min.js
461 ms
messages.min.js
465 ms
hikashop.js
535 ms
fd.js
50 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
19 ms
font-awesome5-all.min.js
1582 ms
font-awesome5-shim.min.js
552 ms
notify.min.js
555 ms
notify.js
556 ms
main.js
629 ms
length.min.js
647 ms
swiper.min.js
930 ms
showcase.init.js
649 ms
bg2.jpg
279 ms
security-foilings-white1.png
205 ms
facebook.png
203 ms
twitter.png
93 ms
linked-in.png
204 ms
google.png
204 ms
sub-banner1.jpg
452 ms
www.securityfoiling.co.uk
576 ms
mk2.jpg
550 ms
feeder.jpg
641 ms
feed-vacum.jpg
720 ms
auto-feed.jpg
525 ms
picon.jpg
1169 ms
Suffolk_Chamber_of_Commerce_members_logo.PNG
701 ms
bg-01.svg
643 ms
2024_SFL_Logo_final3-720.png
1033 ms
Cyber-Essentials-Logo.png
733 ms
heebo-v9-latin-800.woff
671 ms
heebo-v9-latin-500.woff
724 ms
heebo-v9-latin-regular.woff
749 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
942 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
771 ms
securityfoiling.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
securityfoiling.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
securityfoiling.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Securityfoiling.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Securityfoiling.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
securityfoiling.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Securityfoiling. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: