Tools & Wizards About Us
selection-criteria.com.au screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

selection-criteria.com.au

Selection Criteria | Government Selection Criteria

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

663 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

selection-criteria.com.au screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Selection Criteria content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about selection-criteria.com.au

How to address selection criteria when applying for a government job. Tips, tricks, templates and examples to make your application writing quick and easy.

Visit selection-criteria.com.au

Key Findings

We analyzed Selection-criteria.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 663 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

selection-criteria.com.au performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.208

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

selection-criteria.com.au

663 ms

selection-criteria.com.au

876 ms

css

38 ms

custom.css

217 ms

custom2.css

436 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Selection-criteria.com.au, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Selection-criteria.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.0 kB (8%)

Content Size

513.3 kB

After Optimization

471.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Selection-criteria.com.au main page is 513.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 232.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 47.6 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 198 B

  • Original 225.9 kB
  • After minification 225.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Selection Criteria images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 232.3 kB
  • After minification 232.3 kB
  • After compression 230.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 186 B

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selection-criteria.com.au has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (58%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selection Criteria. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

selection-criteria.com.au

selection-criteria.com.au

663 ms

selection-criteria.com.au

selection-criteria.com.au

876 ms

css

css

38 ms

custom.css

custom.css

217 ms

custom2.css

custom2.css

436 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

658 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

868 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

656 ms

jquery-cookie.min.js

jquery-cookie.min.js

646 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

648 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

650 ms

jquery.validation.min.js

jquery.validation.min.js

864 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

863 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

892 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

897 ms

vide.min.js

vide.min.js

899 ms

theme.js

theme.js

1084 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1306 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1319 ms

demo-finance.js

demo-finance.js

1087 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

1088 ms

counter.js

counter.js

37 ms

3ebooks.jpg

3ebooks.jpg

1300 ms

sc_logo.jpg

sc_logo.jpg

411 ms

index-header.jpg

index-header.jpg

1042 ms

5stars.png

5stars.png

620 ms

main.js

main.js

219 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

64 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

648 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1075 ms

t.php

t.php

124 ms

parallax-selectioncriteria.jpg

parallax-selectioncriteria.jpg

233 ms

parallax-resume.jpg

parallax-resume.jpg

430 ms

parallax-interview.jpg

parallax-interview.jpg

231 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

23 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

28 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff

41 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

41 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

45 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

448 ms

Accessibility Review

selection-criteria.com.au accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

selection-criteria.com.au best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

selection-criteria.com.au SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selection-criteria.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Selection-criteria.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

selection-criteria.com.au

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Selection Criteria. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: