Tools & Wizards About Us
selectioncriteria-examples.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

selectioncriteria-examples.com

Selection Criteria Examples - Addressing Selection Criteria -Interview Questions and Answers

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

981 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

selectioncriteria-examples.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Selection Criteria Examples content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about selectioncriteria-examples.com

Selection Criteria Examples. Selection Criteria Examples and Answers to Address Selection Criteria Examples. Selection Criteria Examples. You may have the qualitifications and experience to get the jo...

Visit selectioncriteria-examples.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Selectioncriteria-examples.com page load time and found that the first response time was 981 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

selectioncriteria-examples.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.322

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

selectioncriteria-examples.com

981 ms

xsp_styles.css

484 ms

milonic_src.js

512 ms

mmenudom.js

805 ms

INFO_BAR_MENU.js

514 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Selectioncriteria-examples.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Selectioncriteria-examples.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

631.8 kB

After Optimization

560.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Selectioncriteria-examples.com main page is 631.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 526.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 45.5 kB
  • After minification 42.8 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 526.7 kB
  • After minification 516.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Selection Criteria Examples images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 55.4 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 559 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selectioncriteria-examples.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (25%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Selection Criteria Examples. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

selectioncriteria-examples.com

selectioncriteria-examples.com

981 ms

xsp_styles.css

xsp_styles.css

484 ms

milonic_src.js

milonic_src.js

512 ms

mmenudom.js

mmenudom.js

805 ms

INFO_BAR_MENU.js

INFO_BAR_MENU.js

514 ms

MAIN_FOOTER_MENU.js

MAIN_FOOTER_MENU.js

471 ms

ieupdate.js

ieupdate.js

245 ms

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

58 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201.jpg

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201.jpg

510 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples3.JPG

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples3.JPG

797 ms

PayPal-150x174.gif

PayPal-150x174.gif

328 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201f2.JPG

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201f2.JPG

322 ms

shadow.gif

shadow.gif

294 ms

guarantee.gif

guarantee.gif

332 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201t.jpg

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201t.jpg

1024 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201y.jpg

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201y.jpg

1052 ms

30-day-04.gif

30-day-04.gif

576 ms

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201e.jpg

Selection%20Criteria%20Complete%20Examples%201e.jpg

1295 ms

location8.gif

location8.gif

727 ms

ga.js

ga.js

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

selectioncriteria-examples.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

selectioncriteria-examples.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

selectioncriteria-examples.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selectioncriteria-examples.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Selectioncriteria-examples.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

selectioncriteria-examples.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Selection Criteria Examples. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: