3.2 sec in total
205 ms
2.6 sec
372 ms
Visit selecttool.com now to see the best up-to-date Select Tool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about selecttool.com
Complete Tooling Solutions | Select Tool specializes in checking fixtures, automation, and specialty tooling for the automotive industry and beyond.
Visit selecttool.comWe analyzed Selecttool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
selecttool.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4,240 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value20.6 s
2/100
10%
205 ms
53 ms
155 ms
152 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Selecttool.com, 89% (82 requests) were made to Selecttool.b-cdn.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) relates to the external source Selecttool.b-cdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 147.2 kB (19%)
788.1 kB
640.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Selecttool.com main page is 788.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 539.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Select Tool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Selecttool.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (75%)
88
22
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Select Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.selecttool.com
205 ms
reusablec-block.css
53 ms
style.min.css
155 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
152 ms
style.css
119 ms
grid-system.css
58 ms
style.css
142 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
59 ms
element-flip-box.css
166 ms
element-milestone.css
162 ms
css
61 ms
responsive.css
217 ms
select2.css
173 ms
ascend.css
223 ms
menu-dynamic.css
167 ms
js_composer.min.css
215 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
206 ms
style.css
192 ms
ytprefs.min.css
243 ms
css
63 ms
jquery.min.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
274 ms
rbtools.min.js
274 ms
rs6.min.js
219 ms
ytprefs.min.js
246 ms
iframe_api
62 ms
css
45 ms
style-non-critical.css
299 ms
magnific.css
231 ms
core.css
250 ms
rs6.css
297 ms
core.min.js
338 ms
menu.min.js
299 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
306 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
337 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
322 ms
dom-ready.min.js
379 ms
hooks.min.js
306 ms
i18n.min.js
379 ms
a11y.min.js
377 ms
autocomplete.min.js
377 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
311 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
484 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
347 ms
priority.js
354 ms
transit.min.js
390 ms
waypoints.js
387 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
249 ms
hoverintent.min.js
311 ms
magnific.js
377 ms
anime.min.js
375 ms
superfish.js
369 ms
init.js
352 ms
touchswipe.min.js
345 ms
select2.min.js
338 ms
fitvids.min.js
433 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
340 ms
FB-2nd-nav.png
257 ms
Instagram-secondary-nav.png
260 ms
YouTube-sec-nav.png
261 ms
LinkedInCAN-secondary.png
260 ms
LinkedInMEX-secondary.png
261 ms
Top-Logo.png
262 ms
dummy.png
262 ms
ino-auto-inte.png
232 ms
Home-interior-image.jpg
233 ms
eye.png
230 ms
font
78 ms
gear.png
230 ms
wrench.png
224 ms
Location-FooterIcon.jpg
210 ms
font
58 ms
icomoon.woff
211 ms
www-widgetapi.js
55 ms
Phone-Footer-Icon.jpg
196 ms
Fax-Footer-Icon.jpg
198 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
146 ms
Email-Footer-Icon.jpg
158 ms
NSF-Logo-80x80.png
157 ms
PJR-UKAS-5-2021.png
159 ms
pjri-anab.png
157 ms
FANUCAmerican-icon.png
157 ms
anab-symbol-210x170-1-e1649176040313.png
157 ms
font
126 ms
LinkedIn-CAN-icons.png
145 ms
LinkedInMEX-footer.png
91 ms
Facebook-FT-37x35-1.png
109 ms
IG-ft-org.png
107 ms
YouTube-orange-50x35-1.png
107 ms
25Years-SelectTool.png
109 ms
Home-BG-7.jpg
109 ms
checkmark.png
107 ms
selecttool.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
selecttool.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
selecttool.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Selecttool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Selecttool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
selecttool.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Select Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: