889 ms in total
12 ms
877 ms
0 ms
Visit senquip.com now to see the best up-to-date Senquip content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about senquip.com
Sensor connectivity made easy
Visit senquip.comWe analyzed Senquip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 877 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
senquip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
12 ms
616 ms
233 ms
21 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Senquip.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (616 ms) belongs to the original domain Senquip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 163.2 kB (36%)
454.4 kB
291.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Senquip.com main page is 454.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 187.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Senquip.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (92%)
39
3
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Senquip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
senquip.com
12 ms
senquip.com
616 ms
js
233 ms
style.min.css
21 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
24 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
24 ms
blocks.style.build.css
36 ms
all.css
32 ms
css
82 ms
style.min.css
54 ms
8fa2b62796152f7ce4d6793559ca7fe9.css
29 ms
style.min.css
37 ms
foundation.css
45 ms
style.css
52 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
53 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
65 ms
font-awesome.min.css
67 ms
jetpack.css
71 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
110 ms
jquery.min.js
91 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
69 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
110 ms
js.js
77 ms
lazysizes.min.js
106 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
74 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
86 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
169 ms
hooks.min.js
166 ms
i18n.min.js
167 ms
url.min.js
187 ms
api-fetch.min.js
191 ms
ultp.min.js
193 ms
plugins.min.js
188 ms
scripts.min.js
191 ms
e-202449.js
59 ms
dom-ready.min.js
188 ms
view.js
188 ms
view.js
188 ms
accessible-form.js
189 ms
hcaptcha.js
191 ms
hcaptcha-div-logo.svg
61 ms
senquip.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
senquip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
senquip.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Senquip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Senquip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
senquip.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Senquip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: