3.7 sec in total
203 ms
2.2 sec
1.3 sec
Visit senseye.io now to see the best up-to-date Senseye content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about senseye.io
Senseye Predictive Maintenance helps avoid downtime and save money by automatically forecasting machine failure – without any need for external experts.
Visit senseye.ioWe analyzed Senseye.io page load time and found that the first response time was 203 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
senseye.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.6 s
36/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value10,060 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
203 ms
319 ms
57 ms
76 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Senseye.io, 14% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (571 ms) belongs to the original domain Senseye.io.
Page size can be reduced by 148.2 kB (18%)
818.1 kB
669.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Senseye.io main page is 818.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 510.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 130.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Senseye images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 420 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Senseye.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (77%)
69
16
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Senseye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
senseye.io
203 ms
www.senseye.io
319 ms
jquery-1.11.2.js
57 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
76 ms
layout.min.css
130 ms
main.css
311 ms
theme-overrides.min.css
250 ms
module_33889585606_menu-section.css
214 ms
LanguageSwitcher.css
112 ms
module_33889581954_Banner.min.css
109 ms
module_52805877902_Stats_Panel.min.css
146 ms
module_46566052374_Split_Panel.min.css
152 ms
module_53347565455_Border_Bar.min.css
182 ms
module_53357897256_Logo_Slider.min.css
221 ms
module_53370993077_Tabs_Split_Panel.min.css
187 ms
module_53515868323_Icon_Box_Grid.min.css
240 ms
module_55221982886_Brand_Box_Grid_with_Gradient_Icon_CTA.min.css
232 ms
module_53524754461_Brand_Box_Grid.min.css
481 ms
module_52823978336_Resource_Feed.min.css
250 ms
main.min.js
264 ms
project.js
284 ms
wow.js
294 ms
module_33889585606_menu-section.min.js
293 ms
glider.min.js
294 ms
module_53357897256_Logo_Slider.min.js
346 ms
module_53370993077_Tabs_Split_Panel.min.js
571 ms
533282.js
417 ms
index.js
328 ms
gtm.js
177 ms
Senseye_Siemens%20Logo%20white.svg
138 ms
banner-metals-mining-on-site-maintenance.jpg
141 ms
Tata_logo_05_21.svg
209 ms
Sony_logo_05_21.svg
143 ms
alcoa-logo_05_21.svg
174 ms
Siemens_logo_05_21.svg
448 ms
Nissan_logo_05_21.svg
171 ms
NTT_DoCoMo_logo_05_21.svg
209 ms
smurfit_kappa_05_21.svg
174 ms
mercer-intl-logo-1.svg
216 ms
BlueScope_Logo.svg.png
384 ms
leadflows.js
120 ms
collectedforms.js
164 ms
533282.js
240 ms
conversations-embed.js
238 ms
533282.js
263 ms
fb.js
239 ms
landing
219 ms
analytics.js
228 ms
insight.min.js
225 ms
w.js
210 ms
js
107 ms
roundtrip.js
208 ms
Alcoa-company-4.png
83 ms
collect
19 ms
index.js
10 ms
settings.luckyorange.net
37 ms
H7CWAL4SHVAJRMIBEANPKM
19 ms
BSWWE2UU2FDQ7HNBPH5BT7.js
9 ms
fbevents.js
35 ms
out
14 ms
sendrolling.js
12 ms
out
46 ms
out
54 ms
out
54 ms
out
53 ms
out
54 ms
out
59 ms
out
65 ms
out
62 ms
pixel
257 ms
Pug
250 ms
tap.php
211 ms
sd
244 ms
pixel
197 ms
sync
58 ms
rum
59 ms
pixel
38 ms
pixel
29 ms
bounce
27 ms
xuid
18 ms
in
9 ms
in
8 ms
20 ms
27 ms
senseye.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
senseye.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
senseye.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Senseye.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Senseye.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
senseye.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Senseye. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: