911 ms in total
185 ms
640 ms
86 ms
Visit seqsm.com now to see the best up-to-date Seqsm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seqsm.com
Visit seqsm.comWe analyzed Seqsm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 726 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
seqsm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value3,480 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
185 ms
73 ms
41 ms
49 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Seqsm.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) belongs to the original domain Seqsm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 37.6 kB (13%)
280.8 kB
243.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Seqsm.com main page is 280.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Seqsm needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (94%)
50
3
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seqsm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
seqsm.com
185 ms
seqsm.com
73 ms
style.min.css
41 ms
styles.css
49 ms
cff-style.css
50 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
core_style.css
44 ms
light_style.css
44 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
54 ms
grid-system.css
88 ms
style.css
67 ms
cf7.css
64 ms
css
47 ms
responsive.css
79 ms
skin-material.css
83 ms
menu-dynamic.css
87 ms
js_composer.min.css
89 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
96 ms
tmm_style.css
116 ms
jquery.min.js
124 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
115 ms
style-non-critical.css
144 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
108 ms
core.css
143 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
146 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
154 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
162 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
150 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
161 ms
hooks.min.js
145 ms
i18n.min.js
160 ms
index.js
165 ms
index.js
179 ms
cff-scripts.js
193 ms
collapse.js
190 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
179 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
188 ms
priority.js
190 ms
transit.min.js
207 ms
api.js
46 ms
waypoints.js
206 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
190 ms
hoverintent.min.js
184 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
179 ms
anime.min.js
192 ms
superfish.js
189 ms
init.js
202 ms
touchswipe.min.js
194 ms
index.js
197 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
200 ms
logo-2020-300x150.png
130 ms
recaptcha__en.js
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
50 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
114 ms
icomoon.woff
45 ms
seqsm.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
seqsm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
seqsm.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seqsm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seqsm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
seqsm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Seqsm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: