4.3 sec in total
300 ms
3.1 sec
845 ms
Visit sequel.com now to see the best up-to-date Sequel content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sequel.com
25 years' experience delivering technology and digital solutions to the insurance and reinsurance market
Visit sequel.comWe analyzed Sequel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
sequel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
36/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value21.3 s
0/100
10%
Value22,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.142
78/100
15%
Value30.9 s
0/100
10%
300 ms
169 ms
698 ms
499 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sequel.com, 57% (29 requests) were made to Verisksequel.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Verisksequel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 237.9 kB (15%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Sequel.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sequel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sequel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (47%)
43
23
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sequel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sequel.com
300 ms
www.verisksequel.com
169 ms
www.verisksequel.com
698 ms
main.css
499 ms
api.js
47 ms
bundle.js
963 ms
vendor.js
394 ms
js
179 ms
jquery-3.0.0.min.js
191 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
185 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js
186 ms
runtime-es2015.js
407 ms
runtime-es5.js
423 ms
polyfills-es2015.js
603 ms
polyfills-es5.js
729 ms
main-es2015.js
1856 ms
main-es5.js
1298 ms
umbracoforms.js
602 ms
gtm.js
215 ms
arrow-white.svg
197 ms
6bn.svg
199 ms
9-out-of-10_grey.svg
289 ms
4-out-of-5_grey.svg
290 ms
50.svg
291 ms
voted_2022.svg
351 ms
4-out-of-5.svg
335 ms
shutterstock_1479701399.jpg
354 ms
untitled-design.png
1343 ms
close.svg
427 ms
twitter.svg
418 ms
linkedin.svg
703 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
643 ms
Roboto-Medium.ttf
642 ms
Roboto-Light.ttf
1275 ms
Roboto-Bold.ttf
1276 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
conversion_async.js
54 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
596.js
67 ms
311 ms
335 ms
collect
21 ms
collect
295 ms
gen_204
254 ms
613 ms
585 ms
getconfig
85 ms
fallback
34 ms
fallback__ltr.css
13 ms
css
39 ms
logo_48.png
2 ms
sequel.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sequel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
sequel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sequel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sequel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sequel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sequel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: